Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Estudio de cohortes2020Financiación no declaradaSin ajuste declarado por estilo de vida

Association of Red Meat Usual Intake with Serum Ferritin and the Risk of Metabolic Syndrome in Chinese Adults: A Longitudinal Study from the China Health and Nutrition Survey

Huang LN, Wang HJ, Wang ZH, Zhang JG, Jia XF, Zhang B, Ding GQ

Biomedical and environmental sciences : BES · 16 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Financiación no declaradaSin ajuste declarado por estilo de vida

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Estudio de cohortes (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte
Consumo medido con
Diarios o recordatorios de alimentación

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación no declarada

Publicación

Publicado
2020-01-20 · Biomed Environ Sci · vol. 33 · número 1 · págs. 19–29
Editorial
National Institutes of Health
Citado
22 citas · más que el 93% de estudios similares · 3.4× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
49 trabajos
Acceso
De pago
Áreas de investigación
Nutritional Studies and Diet · Meat and Animal Product Quality · Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease
Palabras clave
Red meat, Medicine, Confounding, Ferritin, Logistic regression, Metabolic syndrome, Diabetes mellitus, Environmental health, Food science, Internal medicine, Endocrinology, Biology
MeSH
humans, prevalence, risk factors, longitudinal studies, eating, adult, aged, aged, 80 and over, middle aged, china, female, male, ferritins, young adult, red meat, metabolic syndrome

7 autores

  • Li Na Huang🇨🇳Chinese Center For Disease Control and Prevention; National Institute for Nutrition and Health
  • Hui Jun Wang🇨🇳Chinese Center For Disease Control and Prevention; National Institute for Nutrition and Health
  • Zhi Hong Wang🇨🇳Chinese Center For Disease Control and Prevention; National Institute for Nutrition and Health
  • Ji Guo Zhang🇨🇳Chinese Center For Disease Control and Prevention; National Institute for Nutrition and Health
  • Xiao Fang Jia🇨🇳Chinese Center For Disease Control and Prevention; National Institute for Nutrition and Health
  • Bing Zhang🇨🇳Chinese Center For Disease Control and Prevention; National Institute for Nutrition and Health
  • Gang Qiang Ding🇨🇳Chinese Center For Disease Control and Prevention; National Institute for Nutrition and Health

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Objective

The present study aimed to investigate the association of red meat usual intake with metabolic syndrome (MetS), and explore the contribution of red meat usual intake to serum ferritin.

Methods

Based on the data from the longitudinal China Health and Nutrition Survey (CHNS), 2,797 healthy adults aged 18-75 years without hypertension, diabetes, and MetS were selected in 2009 as subjects and follow-up studies were carried out till 2015. We used the National Cancer Institute (NCI) method to estimate the usual intake of foods. Multivariable logistic regressions were performed to evaluate the association between red meat usual intake and the risk of MetS. Quantile regression analysis was used to study the relationship between red meat consumption and serum ferritin levels.

Results

After adjusting for potential confounders, red meat, and fresh red meat were positively associated with the risk of MetS ( RR = 1.41, 95% CI: 1.05-1.90 and RR = 1.37, 95% CI: 1.02-1.85, respectively). These relationships showed increasing trend ( P P P < 0.05). Processed red meat did not exhibit a similar association.

Conclusion

Higher red meat usual intake was associated with an increased risk of MetS and elevated serum ferritin levels.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.