Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Estudio de cohortes2020Acceso abierto

Associations of habitual fish oil supplementation with cardiovascular outcomes and all cause mortality: evidence from a large population based cohort study

Li ZH, Zhong WF, Liu S, Kraus VB, Zhang YJ, Gao X, Lv YB, Shen D, Zhang XR, Zhang PD, Huang QM, Chen Q, Wu XB, Shi XM, Wang D, Mao C

BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 69 citas

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Estudio de cohortes (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente
Gobierno
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Gobierno
National Institutes of Health
Gobierno
National Institute on Aging
Gobierno
NIA NIH HHS
Subvenciones
National Institute on Aging (P30/AG028716); National Natural Science Foundation of China (81973109); National Institutes of Health (P30-AG-028716); National Institutes of Health (AG028716)

Según 4 financiadores declarados y la declaración de financiación del texto completo.

Publicación

Publicado
2020-03-04 · BMJ · vol. 368 · pág. m456
Citado
102 citas · más que el 98% de estudios similares · 6.6× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
49 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (revista híbrida) · CC-BY-NC
Áreas de investigación
Fatty Acid Research and Health · Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress · Coenzyme Q10 studies and effects
Palabras clave
Medicine, Hazard ratio, Cohort, Fish oil, Prospective cohort study, Cohort study, Biobank, Confidence interval, Population, Demography, Internal medicine, Environmental health, Fish <Actinopterygii>, Biology, Bioinformatics
MeSH
humans, cardiovascular diseases, fish oils, risk factors, prospective studies, dietary supplements, adult, aged, middle aged, female, male, united kingdom

16 autores

  • Zhihao Li🇨🇳Southern Medical University
  • Wen-Fang Zhong🇨🇳Southern Medical University
  • Simin Liu🇺🇸Brown University
  • Virginia B. Kraus🇺🇸Duke University
  • Yu-Jie Zhang🇨🇳Southern Medical University
  • Xiang Gao🇺🇸Pennsylvania State University
  • Yuebin Lv🇨🇳Chinese Center For Disease Control and Prevention
  • Dong Shen🇨🇳Southern Medical University
  • Xi-Ru Zhang🇨🇳Southern Medical University
  • Peidong Zhang🇨🇳Southern Medical University
  • Qing‐Mei Huang🇨🇳Southern Medical University
  • Qing Chen🇨🇳Southern Medical University
  • Xian-Bo Wu🇨🇳Southern Medical University
  • Xiao‐Ming Shi🇨🇳Chinese Center For Disease Control and Prevention
  • Dong Wang🇨🇳Southern Medical University
  • Chen Mao🇨🇳 · autor de correspondenciaSouthern Medical University

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Objectives

To evaluate the associations of habitual fish oil supplementation with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and mortality in a large prospective cohort.

Design

Population based, prospective cohort study.

Setting

UK Biobank.

Participants

A total of 427 678 men and women aged between 40 and 69 who had no CVD or cancer at baseline were enrolled between 2006 and 2010 and followed up to the end of 2018.

Main exposure

All participants answered questions on the habitual use of supplements, including fish oil.

Main outcome measures

All cause mortality, CVD mortality, and CVD events.

Results

At baseline, 133 438 (31.2%) of the 427 678 participants reported habitual use of fish oil supplements. The multivariable adjusted hazard ratios for habitual users of fish oil versus non-users were 0.87 (95% confidence interval 0.83 to 0.90) for all cause mortality, 0.84 (0.78 to 0.91) for CVD mortality, and 0.93 (0.90 to 0.96) for incident CVD events. For CVD events, the association seemed to be stronger among those with prevalent hypertension (P for interaction=0.005).

Conclusions

Habitual use of fish oil seems to be associated with a lower risk of all cause and CVD mortality and to provide a marginal benefit against CVD events among the general population.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY-NC).

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.