Red and Processed Meat, Poultry, Fish, and Egg Intakes and Cause-Specific and All-Cause Mortality among Men with Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer in a U.S. Cohort
Wang Y, Jacobs EJ, Shah RA, Stevens VL, Gansler T, McCullough ML
Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 14 citas
Etiquetas de revisión
Mezcla carne procesada con no procesadaSin ajuste declarado por estilo de vidaDatos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.
Cómo se estudió
- Diseño
- Estudio de cohortes (clasificado por nuestro filtro de IA)
- Estudiado en
- Personas
- Resultado principal
- Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte
- Consumo medido con
- No se indica
Quién lo pagó
- Financiación
- Financiación independiente
- Organización sin fines de lucro
- American Cancer Society
Según 1 financiador declarado.
Publicación
- Publicado
- 2020-03-04 · Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev · vol. 29 · número 5 · págs. 1029–1038
- Editorial
- American Association for Cancer Research
- Citado
- 25 citas · más que el 93% de estudios similares · 3.4× el promedio de su campo
- Impacto
- Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
- Referencias
- 35 trabajos
- Acceso
- De pago
- Áreas de investigación
- Nutritional Studies and Diet · Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment · Nutrition and Health in Aging
- Palabras clave
- Prostate cancer, Medicine, Red meat, Quartile, Cancer, Cohort study, Cohort, Relative risk, Confidence interval, Proportional hazards model, Lower risk, Prostate, Internal medicine, Gynecology, Pathology
- MeSH
- animals, poultry, fishes, humans, prostatic neoplasms, cardiovascular diseases, diet surveys, cause of death, risk assessment, follow-up studies, feeding behavior, nutrition policy, eggs, meat products, aged, united states, male, red meat, cancer survivors
6 autores
- Ying Wang🇺🇸 · autor de correspondenciaAmerican Cancer Society
- Eric J. Jacobs🇺🇸American Cancer Society
- Roma A. Shah🇺🇸American Cancer Society
- Victoria L. Stevens🇺🇸American Cancer Society
- Ted S. Gansler🇺🇸American Cancer Society
- Marjorie L. McCullough🇺🇸American Cancer Society
Resumen
El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.
Background
Research on the relationship of meat, fish, and egg consumption and mortality among prostate cancer survivors is limited.
Methods
In the Cancer Prevention Study-II Nutrition Cohort, men diagnosed with nonmetastatic prostate cancer between baseline in 1992/1993 and 2015 were followed for mortality until 2016. Analyses of pre- and postdiagnosis intakes of red and processed meat, poultry, fish, and eggs included 9,286 and 4,882 survivors, respectively. Multivariable-adjusted RRs and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models.
Results
A total of 4,682 and 2,768 deaths occurred during follow-up in pre- and postdiagnosis analyses, respectively. Both pre- and postdiagnosis intakes of total red and processed meat were positively associated with all-cause mortality (quartile 4 vs. 1: RR = 1.13; 95% CI, 1.03-1.25; P trend = 0.02; RR = 1.22; 95% CI, 1.07-1.39; P trend = 0.03, respectively), and both pre- and postdiagnosis poultry intakes were inversely associated with all-cause mortality (quartile 4 vs. 1 RR = 0.90; 95% CI, 0.82-0.98; P trend = 0.04; RR = 0.84; 95% CI, 0.75-0.95; P trend = 0.01, respectively). No associations were seen for prostate cancer-specific mortality, except that higher postdiagnosis unprocessed red meat intake was associated with lower risk.
Conclusions
Higher red and processed meat, and lower poultry, intakes either before or after prostate cancer diagnosis were associated with higher risk of all-cause mortality.
Impact
Our findings provide additional evidence that prostate cancer survivors should follow the nutrition guidelines limiting red and processed meat consumption to improve overall survival. Additional research on the relationship of specific meat types and mortality is needed.
Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.
Confianza de la comunidad
Cargando…
¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?
Comentarios
¿Algo está mal aquí?
Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.
Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.