Financiado en parte por International Nut and Dried Fruit Council
Nut consumption in a representative survey of Australians: a secondary analysis of the 2011-2012 National Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey
Nikodijevic CJ, Probst YC, Batterham MJ, Tapsell LC, Neale EP
Public health nutrition · 22 citas
Etiquetas de revisión
Financiado por la industriaSin ajuste declarado por estilo de vidaDatos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.
Cómo se estudió
- Diseño
- Estudio transversal (clasificado por nuestro filtro de IA)
- Estudiado en
- Personas
- Resultado principal
- Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento
- Consumo medido con
- Diarios o recordatorios de alimentación
Quién lo pagó
- Financiación
- Financiado por la industria
- Grupo de la industria
- International Nut and Dried Fruit Council
Según 1 financiador declarado.
Publicación
- Publicado
- 2020-03-10 · Public Health Nutr · vol. 23 · número 18 · págs. 3368–3378
- Editorial
- Cambridge University Press
- Citado
- 28 citas · más que el 84% de estudios similares · 1.8× el promedio de su campo
- Referencias
- 45 trabajos
- Acceso
- Acceso abierto (revista híbrida) · CC-BY
- Áreas de investigación
- Nuts composition and effects · Peanut Plant Research Studies · Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies
- Palabras clave
- Physical activity, Environmental health, Consumption (sociology), Nut, Gerontology, Geography, Medicine, Sociology, Physical therapy, Engineering, Social science
- MeSH
- humans, nuts, anthropometry, exercise, diet, nutrition surveys, blood pressure, adult, middle aged, australia
5 autores
- Cassandra J. Nikodijevic🇦🇺University of Wollongong
- Yasmine Probst🇦🇺University of Wollongong; Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute
- Marijka Jane Batterham🇦🇺University of Wollongong; Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute
- Linda C Tapsell🇦🇺University of Wollongong; Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute
- Elizabeth Phillipa Neale🇦🇺 · autor de correspondenciaUniversity of Wollongong; Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute
Resumen
El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.
Objective
Nut consumption is associated with a range of health benefits. The current study aimed to examine nut consumption in the 2011-2012 National Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey (NNPAS) and to investigate associations between nut intake, nutrient intake and anthropometric and blood pressure measurements.
Design
Secondary analysis of the 2011-2012 NNPAS. Usual consumption of nuts in the 2011-2012 NNPAS was determined, and nut consumption was compared with population recommendations of 30 g nuts per day. The relationship between nut consumption and intakes of key nutrients, anthropometric outcomes (weight, BMI and waist circumference) and blood pressure was examined using linear regression for participants aged over 18 years.
Setting
Australia.
Participants
Australians (2 years and older, n 12 153) participating in the representative 2011-2012 NNPAS.
Results
Mean nut intake was 4·61 (95 % CI: 4·36, 4·86) g/d, with only 5·6 % of nut consumers consuming 30 g of nuts per day. Nut consumption was associated with significantly greater intakes of fibre, vitamin E, Fe, Mg and P. There was no association between nut consumption and body weight, BMI, waist circumference, or blood pressure.
Conclusions
Exploration of nut consumption in a representative sample of Australians identified that nut intake does not meet recommendations. Higher nut consumption was not adversely associated with higher body weight, aligning with the current evidence base. Given the current levels of nut consumption in Australia, strategies to increase nut intake to recommended levels are required.
Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY).
Confianza de la comunidad
Cargando…
¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?
Comentarios
¿Algo está mal aquí?
Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.
Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.