Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Metaanálisis2020Financiación no declarada

Cholesteryl Ester Transfer Protein Inhibitors and Cardiovascular Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Taheri H, Filion KB, Windle SB, Reynier P, Eisenberg MJ

Cardiology · 40 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Financiación no declarada

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Metaanálisis (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación no declarada

Publicación

Publicado
2020-01-01 · Cardiology · vol. 145 · número 4 · págs. 236–250
Editorial
Karger Publishers
Citado
54 citas · más que el 91% de estudios similares · 2.4× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
33 trabajos
Acceso
De pago
Áreas de investigación
Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health · Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism · Paraoxonase enzyme and polymorphisms
Palabras clave
cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitors, CETP inhibitors, dalcetrapib, anacetrapib, evacetrapib, HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, major adverse cardiovascular events, cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, lipid profile
MeSH
humans, cardiovascular diseases, anticholesteremic agents, cholesterol, ldl, cholesterol, hdl, cholesterol ester transfer proteins, randomized controlled trials as topic

5 autores

  • Hossein Taheri🇨🇦Jewish General Hospital; Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research; McGill University
  • Kristian B. Filion🇨🇦Jewish General Hospital; Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research; McGill University
  • Sarah B. Windle🇨🇦Jewish General Hospital; Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research; McGill University
  • Pauline Reynier🇨🇦Jewish General Hospital; Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research; McGill University
  • Mark Jeffrey Eisenberg🇨🇦Jewish General Hospital; Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research; McGill University

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Background

Cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitors increase serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c) concentration; however, their impact on cardiovascular outcomes is not clear. This systematic review examines the effect of CETP inhibitors on serum lipid profiles, cardiovascular events, and all-cause mortality.

Methods

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library of Clinical Trials for placebo-controlled randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that examined the effect of a CETP inhibitor (dalcetrapib, anacetrapib, evacetrapib, or TA-8995) on all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), or the components of MACE at ≥6 months. Data were pooled using random-effects models.

Results

A total of 11 RCTs (n = 62,431) were included in our systematic review; 4 examined dalcetrapib (n = 16,612), 6 anacetrapib (n = 33,682), and 1 evacetrapib (n = 12,092). Compared to dalcetrapib, ana-cetrapib and evacetrapib were more efficacious at raising HDL-c levels (∼100-130 vs. ∼30%). Anacetrapib and evacetrapib also decreased low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) by approximately 30% while dalcetrapib did not affect the LDL-c level. Overall, CETP inhibitors were not associated with the incidence of MACE (pooled relative risk [RR]: 0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.91-1.04). CETP inhibitors may decrease the risks of nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI) (RR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.87-1.00) and cardiovascular death (RR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.83-1.01), though these trends did not reach statistical significance.

Conclusions

CETP inhibitors are not associated with an increased risk of MACE or all-cause mortality. There is a trend towards small reductions in nonfatal MI and cardiovascular death, though the clinical im-portance of such reductions is likely modest.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.