The Cognitive Mechanisms in Music Listening Interventions for Pain: A Scoping Review
Howlin C, Rooney B
Journal of music therapy · 47 citas
Etiquetas de revisión
Solo mecanismosDatos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.
Cómo se estudió
- Diseño
- Revisión sistemática (clasificado por nuestro filtro de IA)
- Estudiado en
- Personas
- Resultado principal
- Solo mecanismos
Quién lo pagó
- Financiación
- Financiación independiente
- Gobierno
- Irish Research Council
- Subvenciones
- Irish Research Council (GOIPG/2017/1006)
Según 1 financiador declarado.
Publicación
- Publicado
- 2020-01-01 · J Music Ther · vol. 57 · número 2 · págs. 127–167
- Editorial
- Oxford University Press
- Citado
- 72 citas · más que el 92% de estudios similares · 3.1× el promedio de su campo
- Impacto
- Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
- Referencias
- 49 trabajos
- Acceso
- De pago
- Áreas de investigación
- Neuroscience and Music Perception · Music Therapy and Health · Diverse Music Education Insights
- Palabras clave
- Active listening, Psychology, Psychological intervention, Cognition, Psychotherapist, Cognitive psychology, Clinical psychology, Psychiatry
- MeSH
- humans, pain, music therapy, emotions, cognition, auditory perception, music, pain management
2 autores
- Claire Howlin🇮🇪 · autor de correspondenciaUniversity College Dublin
- Brendan D. Rooney🇮🇪University College Dublin
Resumen
El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.
Music interventions have been introduced in a range of pain management contexts, yet considerable inconsistencies have been identified across evaluation studies. These inconsistencies have been attributed to a lack of clarity around the prospective cognitive mechanisms of action underlying such interventions. The current systematic scoping review was conducted to examine the theoretical rationales provided in the literature for introducing music listening interventions (MLIs) in pain contexts. 3 search terms (music, listening, and pain) were used in four electronic databases, and 75 articles were included for analysis. Content analysis was used to identify that more intensive listening schedules were associated with chronic and cancer pain compared with procedural pain. The degree to which patients had a choice over the music selection could be categorized into 1 of 5 levels. Thematic synthesis was then applied to develop 5 themes that describe the cognitive mechanisms involved in MLIs for pain. These mechanisms were brought together to build the Cognitive Vitality Model, which emphasizes the role of individual agency in mediating the beneficial effects of music listening through the processes of Meaning-Making, Enjoyment, and Musical Integration. Finally, content analysis was used to demonstrate that only a small proportion of studies were explicitly designed to examine the cognitive mechanisms underlying MLIs and we have suggested ways to improve future practice and empirical research. We call on researchers to design and evaluate MLIs in line with the Cognitive Vitality Model of music listening interventions for pain.
Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.
Confianza de la comunidad
Cargando…
¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?
Comentarios
¿Algo está mal aquí?
Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.
Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.