Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Estudio2020Solo mecanismos

The Cognitive Mechanisms in Music Listening Interventions for Pain: A Scoping Review

Howlin C, Rooney B

Journal of music therapy · 47 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Solo mecanismos

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Revisión sistemática (clasificado por nuestro filtro de IA)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Solo mecanismos

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente
Gobierno
Irish Research Council
Subvenciones
Irish Research Council (GOIPG/2017/1006)

Según 1 financiador declarado.

Publicación

Publicado
2020-01-01 · J Music Ther · vol. 57 · número 2 · págs. 127–167
Editorial
Oxford University Press
Citado
72 citas · más que el 92% de estudios similares · 3.1× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
49 trabajos
Acceso
De pago
Áreas de investigación
Neuroscience and Music Perception · Music Therapy and Health · Diverse Music Education Insights
Palabras clave
Active listening, Psychology, Psychological intervention, Cognition, Psychotherapist, Cognitive psychology, Clinical psychology, Psychiatry
MeSH
humans, pain, music therapy, emotions, cognition, auditory perception, music, pain management

2 autores

  • Claire Howlin🇮🇪 · autor de correspondenciaUniversity College Dublin
  • Brendan D. Rooney🇮🇪University College Dublin

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Music interventions have been introduced in a range of pain management contexts, yet considerable inconsistencies have been identified across evaluation studies. These inconsistencies have been attributed to a lack of clarity around the prospective cognitive mechanisms of action underlying such interventions. The current systematic scoping review was conducted to examine the theoretical rationales provided in the literature for introducing music listening interventions (MLIs) in pain contexts. 3 search terms (music, listening, and pain) were used in four electronic databases, and 75 articles were included for analysis. Content analysis was used to identify that more intensive listening schedules were associated with chronic and cancer pain compared with procedural pain. The degree to which patients had a choice over the music selection could be categorized into 1 of 5 levels. Thematic synthesis was then applied to develop 5 themes that describe the cognitive mechanisms involved in MLIs for pain. These mechanisms were brought together to build the Cognitive Vitality Model, which emphasizes the role of individual agency in mediating the beneficial effects of music listening through the processes of Meaning-Making, Enjoyment, and Musical Integration. Finally, content analysis was used to demonstrate that only a small proportion of studies were explicitly designed to examine the cognitive mechanisms underlying MLIs and we have suggested ways to improve future practice and empirical research. We call on researchers to design and evaluate MLIs in line with the Cognitive Vitality Model of music listening interventions for pain.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.