Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Estudio transversal2020Cuestionario de frecuencia de consumoSin ajuste declarado por estilo de vidaAcceso abierto

Egg consumption and risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus in middle and elderly Chinese population: An observational study

Ni LP, Du LY, Huang YQ, Zhou JY

Medicine · 6 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Cuestionario de frecuencia de consumoSin ajuste declarado por estilo de vida

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Estudio transversal (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte
Consumo medido con
Cuestionario de frecuencia de consumo

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente
Gobierno
the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang

Según 1 financiador declarado.

Publicación

Publicado
2020-04-01 · Medicine (Baltimore) · vol. 99 · número 16 · pág. e19752
Editorial
Wolters Kluwer
Citado
7 citas · más que el 73% de estudios similares · 0.7× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
35 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (revista) · CC-BY-NC
Áreas de investigación
Nutritional Studies and Diet · Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling · Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Palabras clave
Medicine, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetes mellitus, Chinese population, Consumption (sociology), Type 2 diabetes, Internal medicine, Population, Environmental health, Endocrinology
MeSH
humans, diabetes mellitus, type 2, nutrition surveys, cross-sectional studies, eggs, middle aged, china, female, male

4 autores

  • Liping Ni🇨🇳Zhejiang Hospital
  • Li-Yun Du🇨🇳Zhejiang Hospital
  • Yi-Qian Huang🇨🇳Zhejiang Hospital
  • Jianying Zhou🇨🇳 · autor de correspondenciaZhejiang Hospital

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Data on the association between egg consumption and the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in the Chinese population are scarce. In the present study, we aimed to examine the association between egg consumption and the risk of T2DM in a middle and elderly Chinese population. A total of 3298 subjects (1645 men and 1653 women) from the Nutrition and Health Survey (2015-2017) in Hangzhou city were selected for the final analysis. Egg consumption was assessed using a validated food frequency questionnaire. All biochemical data and anthropometric measurements were collected following standardized procedures. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to assess the association between egg consumption and the risk of T2DM and the results were presented as odds ratios and 95% confidence interval (CI). Restricted cubic spline combined with logistic regression was used to explore the dose-response relationship between egg consumption and T2DM. Among 3298 subjects, 693 (21.0%) people had T2DM. Compared with participants who did not consume egg per week, the multivariable-adjusted odds ratios were 0.97 (95%CI : 0.78-1.21), 1.08 (95%CI : 0.91-1.06), 1.20 (95%CI : 0.94-1.55), 1.27 (95%CI : 0.99-1.68) in men (P > .05); 1.06 (95%CI : 0.81-1.37), 0.97 (95%CI : 0.78-1.21), 1.26 (95%CI : 0.99-1.59), 1.19 (0.92-1.54) in women (P > .05); 0.89 (95%CI : 0.79-1.04), 0.98 (95%CI : 0.91-1.06), 1.06 (95%CI : 0.87-1.30), 1.09 (95%CI : 0.88-1.34) in both men and women for egg consumption 0∼7, 7, 7∼14, and ≥14 eggs/week, respectively (P > .05). The dose-response curve showed that, with the increase of egg consumption, the risk of T2DM first increased and then decreased (P = .027).We found that the association between egg consumption and T2DM was nonlinear, and higher egg consumption was not associated with an elevated risk for T2DM in middle-aged and elderly Chinese. However, future prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY-NC).

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.