Music Therapy in the Psychosocial Treatment of Adult Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Köhler F, Martin ZS, Hertrampf RS, Gäbel C, Kessler J, Ditzen B, Warth M
Frontiers in psychology · 56 citas
Cómo se estudió
- Diseño
- Revisión sistemática (indexado por PubMed)
- Estudiado en
- Personas
- Resultado principal
- Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento
Quién lo pagó
- Financiación
- Financiación independiente
- Universidad u hospital
- Universität Heidelberg
- Organización sin fines de lucro
- Hector Stiftung
Según 2 financiadores declarados y la declaración de financiación del texto completo.
Publicación
- Publicado
- 2020-04-16 · Front Psychol · vol. 11 · pág. 651
- Editorial
- Frontiers Media
- Citado
- 130 citas · más que el 93% de estudios similares · 3.4× el promedio de su campo
- Impacto
- Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
- Referencias
- 56 trabajos
- Acceso
- Acceso abierto (revista) · CC-BY
- Áreas de investigación
- Music Therapy and Health · Art Therapy and Mental Health · Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
- Palabras clave
- Music therapy, Randomized controlled trial, Meta-analysis, Psychosocial, Anxiety, Psychology, Psychotherapist, Quality of life (healthcare), Clinical psychology, Systematic review, Distress, Moderation, MEDLINE, Physical therapy, Medicine, Psychiatry, Internal medicine
7 autores
- Friederike Köhler🇩🇪Heidelberg University; University Hospital Heidelberg
- Zoe-Sofia Martin🇩🇪Heidelberg University
- Ruth-Susanne Hertrampf🇩🇰Aalborg University
- Christine Gäbel🇩🇪Heidelberg University; University Hospital Heidelberg
- Jens Keßler🇩🇪Heidelberg University; University Hospital Heidelberg
- Beate Ditzen🇩🇪Heidelberg University; University Hospital Heidelberg
- Marco Warth🇩🇪 · autor de correspondenciaHeidelberg University; University Hospital Heidelberg
Resumen
El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.
Introduction: Music therapy is used as an adjunct oncological treatment aiming at the improvement of psychological and physical well-being through music. A growing body of randomized and non-randomized controlled trials has been published and reviewed recently. However, a global, quantitative assessment of the effectiveness of music therapy in adult cancer care is missing. The present study thus aims to synthesize the evidence of music therapy in different oncological treatment phases. Methods: We conducted a pre-registered systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO-ID: CRD42019133084) following standard guidelines. We searched electronic databases for studies on music therapy performed by a therapist with adult cancer patients. Results: The narrative synthesis included thirty studies showing that music therapy overall had positive effects on a broad range of outcomes, with techniques and effects varying in different phases. During curative treatment, results were most promising with regard to anxiety, depression, and pain medication intake, while in palliative settings, improvements with regard to quality of life, spiritual well-being, pain, and stress were reported. Twenty-one studies were included in the meta-analysis which showed small but significant effects of music therapy on psychological well-being (d = 0.35, p d = -0.26, p = 0.017), and quality of life (d = 0.36, p = 0.023). Heterogeneity between effect sizes was small to medium. Moderator analyses identified studies with a single session of music therapy and the use of receptive techniques to produce larger effects regarding psychological well-being. Conclusion: Music therapy can improve relevant health-outcomes in cancer patients and should therefore be offered in various treatment phases. Future research should include potential moderators such as individual information about patients to find out who benefits most from different kinds of music therapy.
Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY).
Confianza de la comunidad
Cargando…
¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?
Comentarios
¿Algo está mal aquí?
Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.
Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.