Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Estudio2021Cuestionario de frecuencia de consumoSolo mecanismos

Higher ultra-processed food intake is associated with higher DNA damage in healthy adolescents

Edalati S, Edalati S, Bagherzadeh F, Asghari Jafarabadi M, Ebrahimi-Mamaghani M

The British journal of nutrition · 38 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Cuestionario de frecuencia de consumoSolo mecanismos

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Estudio transversal (clasificado por nuestro filtro de IA)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Solo mecanismos
Consumo medido con
Cuestionario de frecuencia de consumo

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente
Universidad u hospital
Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
Universidad u hospital
University of Tabriz

Según 2 financiadores declarados.

Publicación

Publicado
2020-06-09 · Br J Nutr · vol. 125 · número 5 · págs. 568–576
Editorial
Cambridge University Press
Citado
47 citas · más que el 95% de estudios similares · 4.3× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
109 trabajos
Acceso
Lectura gratuita
Áreas de investigación
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling · Nutritional Studies and Diet · Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Palabras clave
Medicine, Confounding, Creatinine, Environmental health, Obesity, Food group, Urinary system, Mediterranean diet, Biomarker, Food science, Internal medicine, Biology
MeSH
humans, obesity, dna damage, body mass index, diet, sex factors, energy intake, food handling, adolescent, iran, female, male, young adult, biomarkers, edible grain, 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine

4 autores

  • Sareh Edalati🇮🇷National Nutrition and Food Technology Research Institute; Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
  • Farzaneh Bagherzadeh🇮🇷Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
  • Mohammad Asghari Jafarabadi🇮🇷Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
  • Mehrangiz Ebrahimi‐Mameghani🇮🇷 · autor de correspondenciaTabriz University of Medical Sciences

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Ultra-processed food is one of the main contributors to energy supply and consumption in food systems worldwide, and evidence of their detrimental health outcomes in humans is emerging. This study aimed to assess ultra-processed food intake and its association with urinary levels of 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG), a biomarker of DNA oxidative damage, in 139 healthy adolescents in Karaj City in Iran. Usual dietary intake was measured using a 168-item validated FFQ. The daily intake of ultra-processed food consumption was determined through the classification of NOVA, and general linear models were used to compare the urinary levels of 8-OHdG/creatinine (ng/mg creatinine) within tertiles of ultra-processed food intake. Adolescents in the higher tertile of ultra-processed food consumption had a significantly higher mean level of urinary 8-OHdG/creatinine in comparison with the lower tertiles in the crude model (Pfor trend: 0·003) and after adjustment for confounding variables, including total energy intake, sex, age, BMI for age Z-score, obesity and physical activity (Pfor trend: 0·004). This association was still significant after adjusting for dietary intake of whole grains, nuts, legumes, the ratio of MUFA:SFA (g/d) and Mediterranean dietary score (Pfor trend: 0·002). More studies are needed to explore the determinants of ultra-processed food supply, demand, consumption and health effects; such studies should be applied to develop evidence-informed policies and regulatory mechanisms to improve children's and adolescents' food environment policymaking and legislation with special attention to ultra-processed food.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.