The effect of photobiomodulation on human dental pulp-derived stem cells: systematic review
Kulkarni S, Meer M, George R
Lasers in medical science · 26 citas
Etiquetas de revisión
Financiación no declaradaSolo mecanismosDatos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.
Cómo se estudió
- Diseño
- Revisión sistemática (indexado por PubMed)
- Estudiado en
- Células o muestras de laboratorio
- Resultado principal
- Solo mecanismos
Quién lo pagó
- Financiación
- Financiación no declarada
Publicación
- Publicado
- 2020-06-22 · Lasers Med Sci · vol. 35 · número 9 · págs. 1889–1897
- Editorial
- Springer Science+Business Media
- Citado
- 40 citas · más que el 76% de estudios similares · 1.3× el promedio de su campo
- Referencias
- 28 trabajos
- Acceso
- Acceso abierto (copia en repositorio) · OTHER-OA
- Áreas de investigación
- Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine · Mesenchymal stem cell research · Biofield Effects and Biophysics
- Palabras clave
- low-level laser therapy, dental pulp stem cells, cell proliferation, cell viability, osteogenic differentiation, InGaAlP laser, LED stimulation
- MeSH
- cells, cultured, stem cells, tooth, deciduous, dental pulp, humans, risk, cell differentiation, cell proliferation, cell survival, publication bias, low-level light therapy, outcome assessment, health care
3 autores
- Sachin Kulkarni🇦🇺Griffith University; The University of Adelaide
- Mohammed Meer🇦🇺Griffith University
- Roy George🇦🇺 · autor de correspondenciaGriffith University
Resumen
El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.
This systematic review assessed if photobiomodulation of human dental pulp tissue improved cell viability, proliferation, and/or differentiation compared with a placebo. This systematic review was conducted in line with PRISMA. PICO question was established; inclusion and exclusion criteria were established before a search had begun. A literature search was conducted through PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane. Studies were included if published within the last 20 years in English language, or where translation was available; laser parameters were mentioned; human dental pulp tissue was studied in vitro. Studies were excluded if non-human dental pulp tissue was studied and where the study was an in vivo study. Out of the total 121 studies found, 109 were excluded. Of the twelve included studies, three full-text articles were not available despite attempts made to contact the respective authors, leaving nine studies. Four of the included studies reported the use of stem cells derived from human deciduous teeth (SHEDs), and five used those from human permanent teeth (DPSCs). Most included studies utilized InGaAlP laser with wavelengths 660 nm, and one study with 610 nm. Other types of lasers included LED InGaN, and GaAlAs. Out of all included studies, two had a moderate risk of bias, and the rest had a low risk of bias. All studies confirmed positive effects on proliferation. One study also found improved osteogenic differentiation of the stem cells derived from stem cells of deciduous teeth. After assessing SHEDs and DPSCs separately, it is found that photobiomodulation improved cell proliferation in both subgroups. Due to heterogeneity in design protocols and laser parameters, it was not possible to compare the studies together. However, this study indicated that cell viability and proliferation did improve with photobiomodulation.
Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.
Confianza de la comunidad
Cargando…
¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?
Comentarios
¿Algo está mal aquí?
Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.
Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.