Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Metaanálisis2020Financiación no declarada

Photobiomodulation in oral mucositis in patients with head and neck cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis followed by a cost-effectiveness analysis

Campos TM, do Prado Tavares Silva CA, Sobral APT, Sobral SS, Rodrigues MFSD, Bussadori SK, Fernandes KPS, Mesquita-Ferrari RA, Horliana ACRT, Motta LJ

Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 24 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Financiación no declarada

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Metaanálisis (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación no declarada

Publicación

Publicado
2020-07-14 · Support Care Cancer · vol. 28 · número 12 · págs. 5649–5659
Editorial
Springer Science+Business Media
Citado
35 citas · más que el 76% de estudios similares · 1.0× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
44 trabajos
Acceso
De pago
Áreas de investigación
Oral health in cancer treatment · Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine · Oral Health Pathology and Treatment
Palabras clave
oral mucositis, low-level laser therapy, head and neck cancer, cancer treatment toxicity, analgesia, cost-effectiveness, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio
MeSH
humans, head and neck neoplasms, stomatitis, radiation injuries, phototherapy, cost-benefit analysis, randomized controlled trials as topic, laser therapy

10 autores

  • Thalita Molinos Campos🇧🇷Universidade Nove de Julho
  • Carolina Antunes do Prado Tavares Silva🇧🇷Universidade Nove de Julho
  • Ana Paula Taboada Sobral🇧🇷Universidade Nove de Julho
  • Sérgio de Sousa Sobral🇧🇷Universidade Nove de Julho
  • Maria Fernanda Setúbal Destro Rodrigues🇧🇷Universidade Nove de Julho
  • Sandra Kalil Bussadori🇧🇷Universidade Nove de Julho
  • Kristianne Porta Santos Fernandes🇧🇷Universidade Nove de Julho
  • Raquel Agnelli Mesquita‐Ferrari🇧🇷Universidade Nove de Julho
  • Anna Carolina Ratto Tempestini Horliana🇧🇷Universidade Nove de Julho
  • Lara Jansiski Motta🇧🇷 · autor de correspondenciaUniversidade Nove de Julho

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Background

Oral mucositis (OM) is an oral toxicity caused by cancer treatment, found often in patients with head and neck cancer. Low-intensity laser therapy for OM has anti-inflammatory, analgesic, and tissue reparative properties.

Objective

The objective of this work is to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the randomized clinical trials of OM laser therapy in patients undergoing treatment for head and neck cancers, followed by a cost-effectiveness analysis of the therapy.

Method

The search terms, mucositis and phototherapy, laser therapy and mucositis, photobiomodulation and mucositis, and low-level laser therapy and mucositis, were used to search the databases of PubMed, Web of Science, and MEDLINE. Randomized clinical trials were divided into two groups: one treated with laser therapy and the other given a placebo. Only 13 studies were included in the systematic review, and 6 studies in the meta-analysis.

Results

The results of the systematic review and meta-analysis show that the laser therapy presented good results in clinical improvement and pain reduction, decreasing the patients' likelihood of developing OM, with degrees of debilitating lesions, to 64% (RR = 0.36 [95% CI = 0.29-0.44]). The cost-effectiveness analysis revealed an incremental cost of R$ 3687.53 for the laser group, with an incremental effectiveness of 132.2. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was 27.89, for the severe OM cases that were avoided.

Conclusion

It was concluded, therefore, that photobiomodulation for OM in patients receiving head and neck cancer treatment was clinically effective and cost-effective.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.