Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Ensayo controlado aleatorizado2020Financiación no declaradaAcceso abierto

Low-level laser therapy effectiveness in reducing initial orthodontic archwire placement pain in premolars extraction cases: a single-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial

AlSayed Hasan MMA, Sultan K, Ajaj M, Voborná I, Hamadah O

BMC oral health · 16 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Financiación no declarada

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Ensayo controlado aleatorizado (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación no declarada

Publicación

Publicado
2020-07-20 · BMC Oral Health · vol. 20 · número 1 · pág. 209
Editorial
BioMed Central
Citado
31 citas · más que el 83% de estudios similares · 1.5× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
30 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (revista) · CC-BY
Áreas de investigación
Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine · Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics · Dental Anxiety and Anesthesia Techniques
Palabras clave
low-level laser therapy, post-insertion pain, premolar extraction, chewing pain, spontaneous pain, analgesia
MeSH
bicuspid, humans, pain, retrospective studies, single-blind method, orthodontic wires, adolescent, adult, young adult, low-level light therapy

5 autores

  • Mohammad Moaffak A. AlSayed Hasan🇸🇾 · autor de correspondenciaDamascus University
  • Kinda Sultan🇸🇾Damascus University
  • Mowaffak A Ajaj🇸🇾Damascus University
  • Iva Voborná🇨🇿Palacký University Olomouc
  • Omar Hamadah🇸🇾Damascus University

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Background

The objective of this randomized clinical trial was to evaluate Low-Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) effectiveness in spontaneous and chewing pain reduction following initial orthodontic archwire placement.

Methods

26 patients (mean age 20.07 ± 3.13 years) with maxillary Little's Irregularity Index (LII) of 7 mm or more that indicates first maxillary premolars extraction and no medications intake were eligible for this trial. Patients were randomly assigned with 1:1 ratio using simple randomization technique to receive either LLL or placebo treatment. Blinding was applicable for patients only. In the laser group, patients received a single LLL dose (wavelength 830 nm, energy 2 J/point) in four points (2 buccal, 2 palatal) for each maxillary anterior tooth root. Patients in the placebo group had the same laser application procedure without emitting the laser beam. Patients were asked to score spontaneous and chewing pain intensity by filling out a questionnaire with a 100-mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) after 1, 6, 24, 48, and 72 h of treatment application. Independent t-test was used to compare the mean pain scores between the laser and placebo groups for both spontaneous and chewing pain at each studied time point.

Results

No dropout occurred so the results of the 26 patients were statistically analyzed. Despite some clinical differences observed between the two groups, no statistical significance was found for each studied time point (p > 0.05) for both spontaneous and chewing pain except after 72 h for chewing pain with a VAS score of (18.84 ± 13.44) mm for the laser group compared to (38.15 ± 27.06) mm for the placebo group.

Conclusions

LLLT, with the suggested parameters, is not effective in pain reduction following initial orthodontic archwire placement.

Trial registration

Name of the registry: Clinicaltrials.gov Trial registration number: NCT02568436. Date of registration: 26 September 2015 'Retrospectively registered'.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY).

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.