Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Ensayo controlado aleatorizado2021Financiación no declarada

Canola oil compared with sesame and sesame-canola oil on glycaemic control and liver function in patients with type 2 diabetes: A three-way randomized triple-blind cross-over trial

Raeisi-Dehkordi H, Amiri M, Zimorovat A, Moghtaderi F, Zarei S, Forbes SC, Salehi-Abargouei A

Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews · 15 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Financiación no declarada

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Ensayo controlado aleatorizado (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento
Consumo medido con
No se indica

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación no declarada

Publicación

Publicado
2020-08-29 · Diabetes Metab Res Rev · vol. 37 · número 5 · pág. e3399
Editorial
Wiley
Citado
27 citas · más que el 93% de estudios similares · 4.1× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
65 trabajos
Acceso
De pago
Áreas de investigación
Sesame and Sesamin Research · Fatty Acid Research and Health · Diet and metabolism studies
Palabras clave
Medicine, Internal medicine, Insulin resistance, Type 2 diabetes, Quantitative insulin sensitivity check index, Insulin, Diabetes mellitus, Canola, Liver function, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Endocrinology, Gastroenterology, Insulin sensitivity, Biology, Food science
MeSH
liver, humans, sesamum, diabetes mellitus, type 2, insulin resistance, sesame oil, cross-over studies, female, male, rapeseed oil, glycemic control

7 autores

  • Hamidreza Raeisi‐Dehkordi🇮🇷Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences and Health Services
  • Mojgan Amiri🇮🇷Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences and Health Services
  • Alireza Zimorovat🇮🇷Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences and Health Services
  • Fatemeh Moghtaderi🇮🇷Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences and Health Services
  • Sadegh Zarei🇮🇷Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences
  • Scott C. Forbes🇨🇦Brandon University
  • Amin Salehi‐Abargouei🇮🇷 · autor de correspondenciaShahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences and Health Services

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Background

This study aimed to compare the effects of sesame (SO), canola (CO), and sesame-canola (SCO: a blend) oils on glycaemic control markers and liver function enzymes in adults with type 2 diabetes.

Methods

In this randomized, triple-blind, three-way, cross-over clinical trial, participants replaced their usual oil with the intervention oils for 9 weeks. Serum fasting blood sugar, fasting serum insulin (FSI), insulin resistance (HOMA2-IR), beta-cell function (HOMA2-%B), insulin sensitivity (HOMA2-%S), quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI), as well as serum liver function enzymes were measured at baseline and end of intervention periods.

Results

Ninety-two participants completed all treatment periods. After adjusting for confounders, all treatment oils resulted in significant improvements in FSI and HOMA2-%S (p < 0.05). SO and SCO led to favourable changes in HOMA2-IR and QUICKI (p < 0.05). Following CO and SCO, there was a significant decrease in HOMA2-%B (p < 0.05). The sex-stratified analysis revealed that FSI and HOMA2-IR were decreased after SO compared to CO in males (p = 0.024). Serum gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) was significantly lower following SO compared to CO in females (p = 0.02), however, the difference in change values was not significant (p = 0.058).

Conclusions

SO consumption appears to improve glycaemic control markers in males and serum GGT in females compared with CO in patients with type 2 diabetes (registration code: IRCT2016091312571N6).

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.