Social Media Use and Mental Health and Well-Being Among Adolescents - A Scoping Review
Schønning V, Hjetland GJ, Aarø LE, Skogen JC
Frontiers in psychology · 124 citas
Cómo se estudió
- Diseño
- Revisión sistemática (clasificado por nuestro filtro de IA)
- Estudiado en
- Personas
- Resultado principal
- Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento
Quién lo pagó
- Financiación
- Financiación independiente
- Gobierno
- Helsedirektoratet
Según 1 financiador declarado y la declaración de financiación del texto completo.
Publicación
- Publicado
- 2020-08-14 · Front Psychol · vol. 11 · pág. 1949
- Editorial
- Frontiers Media
- Citado
- 297 citas · más que el 100% de estudios similares · 43.5× el promedio de su campo
- Impacto
- Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
- Referencias
- 120 trabajos
- Acceso
- Acceso abierto (revista) · CC-BY
- Áreas de investigación
- Impact of Technology on Adolescents · Child Development and Digital Technology · Educational Methods and Impacts
- Palabras clave
- social media use, adolescent mental health, well-being, depression, Facebook, social network sites, adolescents, social media engagement
4 autores
- Viktor Schønning🇳🇴 · autor de correspondenciaNorwegian Institute of Public Health
- Gunnhild Johnsen Hjetland🇳🇴Norwegian Institute of Public Health
- Leif Edvard Aarø🇳🇴Norwegian Institute of Public Health
- Jens Christoffer Skogen🇳🇴Norwegian Institute of Public Health; Stavanger University Hospital; University of Stavanger
Resumen
El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.
Introduction: Social media has become an integrated part of daily life, with an estimated 3 billion social media users worldwide. Adolescents and young adults are the most active users of social media. Research on social media has grown rapidly, with the potential association of social media use and mental health and well-being becoming a polarized and much-studied subject. The current body of knowledge on this theme is complex and difficult-to-follow. The current paper presents a scoping review of the published literature in the research field of social media use and its association with mental health and well-being among adolescents. Methods and Analysis: First, relevant databases were searched for eligible studies with a vast range of relevant search terms for social media use and mental health and well-being over the past five years. Identified studies were screened thoroughly and included or excluded based on prior established criteria. Data from the included studies were extracted and summarized according to the previously published study protocol. Results: Among the 79 studies that met our inclusion criteria, the vast majority (94%) were quantitative, with a cross-sectional design (57%) being the most common study design. Several studies focused on different aspects of mental health, with depression (29%) being the most studied aspect. Almost half of the included studies focused on use of non-specified social network sites (43%). Of specified social media, Facebook (39%) was the most studied social network site. The most used approach to measuring social media use was frequency and duration (56%). Participants of both genders were included in most studies (92%) but seldom examined as an explanatory variable. 77% of the included studies had social media use as the independent variable. Conclusion: The findings from the current scoping review revealed that about 3/4 of the included studies focused on social media and some aspect of pathology. Focus on the potential association between social media use and positive outcomes seems to be rarer in the current literature. Amongst the included studies, few separated between different forms of (inter)actions on social media, which are likely to be differentially associated with mental health and well-being outcomes.
Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY).
Confianza de la comunidad
Cargando…
¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?
Comentarios
¿Algo está mal aquí?
Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.
Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.