Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Ensayo controlado aleatorizado2020Financiación no declarada

Social media use while listening to new material negatively affects short-term memory in college students

Spence A, Beasley K, Gravenkemper H, Hoefler A, Ngo A, Ortiz D, Campisi J

Physiology & behavior · 7 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Financiación no declarada

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Ensayo controlado aleatorizado (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación no declarada

Publicación

Publicado
2020-09-17 · Physiol Behav · vol. 227 · pág. 113172
Editorial
Elsevier BV
Citado
30 citas · más que el 89% de estudios similares · 1.7× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
56 trabajos
Acceso
De pago
Áreas de investigación
Personal Information Management and User Behavior · Impact of Technology on Adolescents · Memory Processes and Influences
Palabras clave
social media use, Instagram, short-term memory, auditory recognition memory, multitasking, university students, smartphone use in class, memory retrieval
MeSH
humans, memory, short-term, students, universities, young adult, social media, social networking

7 autores

  • Allyson L. Spence🇺🇸Regis University
  • Kierian Beasley🇺🇸Regis University
  • Holly Gravenkemper🇺🇸Regis University
  • Alexandra Hoefler🇺🇸Regis University
  • Anthony Ngo🇺🇸Regis University
  • Danielle Ortiz🇺🇸Regis University
  • Jay Campisi🇺🇸 · autor de correspondenciaRegis University

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Increased access to electronic devices and the ubiquity of social media has resulted in a rapid rise in the prevalence of students "multitasking" while in a classroom setting. While some data indicate the use of electronic devices in class can improve the classroom environment, other studies demonstrate the opposite finding. Moreover, it remains unclear if using social networking sites such as Instagram impacts performance on cognitive tasks when students are presented new material and, if so, what features of Instagram modulate this response. Therefore, in the current study we examined if social media use during or after being presented new information affected short-term memory in college students. Additionally, we assessed if the type or quantity of topics displayed had a modulatory impact on memory. Forty-five college-aged (18-24 years of age) students completed the Logical Memory Immediate Recall (LM I) component of the Wechsler Memory Scale IV, a measure of auditory recognition memory. Subjects were randomly divided into a group that completed the LM I without distraction (controls), a group that completed the LM I while scrolling through their Instagram feed, or a group that completed the LM I after scrolling through their Instagram feed. Subjects that used Instagram while being presented new information demonstrated worse short-term memory recall ability compared to subjects that did not use Instagram during the presentation (71.56% correct answers vs. 80.89%; p = 0.01). Recall ability in the group that used Instagram after hearing the story was not statistically different from the controls. Differences were not observed in the number of topics appearing in subjects' Instagram feeds and no correlation was found between the number of topics on a subject's Instagram feed and memory recall ability. Collectively, these results suggest that individuals who use their phones to browse Instagram during class or in social settings might have a reduced ability to retain the information given to them when compared to those that are not using their phones scrolling on social media.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.