Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Metaanálisis2020

The effects of Canola oil on cardiovascular risk factors: A systematic review and meta-analysis with dose-response analysis of controlled clinical trials

Amiri M, Raeisi-Dehkordi H, Sarrafzadegan N, Forbes SC, Salehi-Abargouei A

Nutrition, metabolism, and cardiovascular diseases : NMCD · 34 citas

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Metaanálisis (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento
Consumo medido con
No se indica

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente
Universidad u hospital
Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences

Según 1 financiador declarado.

Publicación

Publicado
2020-06-18 · Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis · vol. 30 · número 12 · págs. 2133–2145
Editorial
Elsevier BV
Citado
47 citas · más que el 71% de estudios similares · 1.1× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
121 trabajos
Acceso
De pago
Áreas de investigación
Fatty Acid Research and Health · Coconut Research and Applications · Edible Oils Quality and Analysis
Palabras clave
Meta-analysis, Canola, Medicine, Clinical trial, Internal medicine, Biology
MeSH
humans, cardiovascular diseases, treatment outcome, risk assessment, risk reduction behavior, energy intake, nutritive value, randomized controlled trials as topic, recommended dietary allowances, protective factors, rapeseed oil, diet, healthy, cardiometabolic risk factors

5 autores

  • Mojgan Amiri🇮🇷Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences and Health Services
  • Hamidreza Raeisi‐Dehkordi🇮🇷Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences and Health Services
  • Nizal Sarrafzadegan🇮🇷🇨🇦Isfahan University of Medical Sciences; University of British Columbia
  • Scott C. Forbes🇨🇦Brandon University
  • Amin Salehi‐Abargouei🇮🇷 · autor de correspondenciaShahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences and Health Services

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Background and aims

Canola oil (CO) is a plant-based oil with the potential to improve several cardiometabolic risk factors. We systematically reviewed controlled clinical trials investigating the effects of CO on lipid profiles, apo-lipoproteins, glycemic indices, inflammation, and blood pressure compared to other edible oils in adults.

Methods and results

Online databases were searched for articles up to January 2020. Forty-two articles met the inclusion criteria. CO significantly reduced total cholesterol (TC, -0.27 mmol/l, n = 37), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C, -0.23 mmol/l, n = 35), LDL-C to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio (LDL/HDL, -0.21, n = 10), TC/HDL (-0.13, n = 15), apolipoprotein B (Apo B, -0.03 g/l, n = 14), and Apo B/Apo A-1 (-0.02, n = 6) compared to other edible oils (P < 0.05). Compared to olive oil, CO decreased TC (-0.23 mmol/l, n = 9), LDL-C (-0.17 mmol/l, n = 9), LDL/HDL (-0.39, n = 2), and triglycerides in VLDL (VLDL-TG, -0.10 mmol/l, n = 2) (P < 0.05). Compared to sunflower oil, CO improved LDL-C (-0.14 mmol/l, n = 11), and LDL/HDL (-0.30, n = 3) (P < 0.05). In comparison with saturated fats, CO improved TC (-0.59 mmol/l, n = 11), TG (-0.08 mmol/l, n = 11), LDL-C (-0.49 mmol/l, n = 10), TC/HDL (-0.29, n = 5), and Apo B (-0.09 g/l, n = 4) (P < 0.05). Based on the nonlinear dose-response curve, replacing CO with ~15% of total caloric intake provided the greatest benefits.

Conclusion

CO significantly improved different cardiometabolic risk factors compared to other edible oils. Further well-designed clinical trials are warranted to confirm the dose-response associations.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.