Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Ensayo controlado aleatorizado2021Financiado por la industria

Financiado en parte por U.S. Highbush Blueberry Council

Blueberry phenolics are associated with cognitive enhancement in supplemented healthy older adults

Rutledge GA, Sandhu AK, Miller MG, Edirisinghe I, Burton-Freeman BB, Shukitt-Hale B

Food & function · 29 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Financiado por la industria

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Ensayo controlado aleatorizado (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento
Consumo medido con
No se indica

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiado por la industria
Gobierno
U.S. Department of Agriculture
Grupo de la industria
U.S. Highbush Blueberry Council
Gobierno
National Institutes of Health
Subvenciones
National Institutes of Health (T32 AG00002941)

Según 3 financiadores declarados.

Publicación

Publicado
2020-12-15 · Food Funct · vol. 12 · número 1 · págs. 107–118
Editorial
Royal Society of Chemistry
Citado
51 citas · más que el 98% de estudios similares · 7.9× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
39 trabajos
Acceso
De pago
Áreas de investigación
Ginkgo biloba and Cashew Applications · Medicinal Plants and Neuroprotection · Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
Palabras clave
Cognition, Food science, Cognitive decline, Medicine, Chemistry, Dementia, Internal medicine, Psychiatry
MeSH
humans, phenols, nootropic agents, double-blind method, cognition, dietary supplements, aged, middle aged, female, male, blueberry plants

6 autores

  • Grant A. Rutledge🇺🇸Tufts University; Agricultural Research Service
  • Amandeep Kaur Sandhu🇺🇸Illinois Institute of Technology
  • Marshall G. Miller🇺🇸Tufts University; Agricultural Research Service
  • Indika Edirisinghe🇺🇸Illinois Institute of Technology
  • Britt Marie Burton‐Freeman🇺🇸Illinois Institute of Technology
  • Barbara Shukitt‐Hale🇺🇸 · autor de correspondenciaTufts University; Agricultural Research Service

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Blueberries (BB) contain an array of bioactive phenolic compounds that may play a protective role against various age-related diseases. Here we explored the metabolic fate of BB phenolics and their relationship to cognitive function after chronic (90 days) supplementation of freeze-dried BB (24 g d-1, equivalent to 1 cup of fresh BB) or control in a randomized, double-blind, parallel study with 38 healthy older adults (60-75 years). Blood samples were collected at fasting (t = 0 h) and 2 h after a breakfast meal on days 0 (no treatment), 45, and 90, and a battery of cognitive tests was also conducted on these days. Hippuric acid, phloroglucinaldehyde, syringic acid, ferulic acid-glucuronide, cyanidin-3-O-galactoside, cyanidin-3-O-glucoside, malvidin-3-O-galactoside, malvidin-3-O-glucoside, peonidin-3-O-xyloside, peonidin glucuronide, and petunidin-3-O-glucoside concentrations were significantly altered after 90 days of BB consumption compared to control. Stepwise regression was used to assess the relationship between significantly altered concentrations of plasma phenolics and observed improvements in cognition. Among participants in the BB group, changes in switch errors on the task-switching test (TST) from day 0 to 90 were associated with changes in postprandial levels of plasma ferulic acid-glucuronide, syringic acid, and malvidin-3-galactoside (R2 = 0.521, p 2 = 0.807, p < 0.001). These findings demonstrate that the addition of easily achievable quantities of BB to the diets of older adults significantly alters levels of circulating phenolic compounds which are related to improvements in cognition.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.