Financiado en parte por Abbott Laboratories, PepsiCo, General Mills, Kellogg's, California Strawberry Commission, Danone, Almond Board of California, Dairy Farmers of Canada, Canola Council of Canada, Alberta Pulse Growers Commission, Loblaw Companies Limited, Soy Nutrition Institute, Herbalife Nutrition, Alpro Foundation, International Nut and Dried Fruit Council, International Sweeteners Association
Nut consumption and type 2 diabetes risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies
Becerra-Tomás N, Paz-Graniel I, Hernández-Alonso P, Jenkins DJA, Kendall CWC, Sievenpiper JL, Salas-Salvadó J
The American journal of clinical nutrition · 31 citas
Etiquetas de revisión
Financiado por la industriaDatos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.
Cómo se estudió
- Diseño
- Metaanálisis (indexado por PubMed)
- Estudiado en
- Personas
- Resultado principal
- Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte
- Consumo medido con
- No se indica
Quién lo pagó
- Financiación
- Financiado por la industria
- Gobierno
- U.S. Department of Agriculture
- Empresa
- Abbott Laboratories
- Empresa
- PepsiCo
- Empresa
- General Mills
- Empresa
- Kellogg's
- Grupo de la industria
- California Strawberry Commission
- Organización sin fines de lucro
- Canadian Diabetes Association
- Universidad u hospital
- Arizona State University
- Empresa
- Danone
- Grupo de la industria
- Almond Board of California
- Grupo de la industria
- Dairy Farmers of Canada
- Organización sin fines de lucro
- Canadian Cardiovascular Society
- Organización sin fines de lucro
- Diabetes Canada
- Gobierno
- European Food Safety Authority
- Organización sin fines de lucro
- Glycemic Index Foundation
- Organización sin fines de lucro
- Canadian Nutrition Society
- Universidad u hospital
- St. Michael's Hospital Foundation
- Grupo de la industria
- Canola Council of Canada
- Grupo de la industria
- Alberta Pulse Growers Commission
- Empresa
- Loblaw Companies Limited
- Organización sin fines de lucro
- Danish Cancer Society Research Center
- Organización sin fines de lucro
- Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine
- Grupo de la industria
- Soy Nutrition Institute
- Empresa
- Herbalife Nutrition
- Organización sin fines de lucro
- Physicians' Services Incorporated Foundation
- Organización sin fines de lucro
- Society for Endocrinology
- Gobierno
- European Commission
- Gobierno
- Generalitat de Catalunya
- Universidad u hospital
- University of Toronto
- Universidad u hospital
- Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats
- Universidad u hospital
- Hospital for Sick Children
- Organización sin fines de lucro
- European Association for the Study of Diabetes
- Empresa
- Alpro Foundation
- Universidad u hospital
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red-Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición
- Grupo de la industria
- International Nut and Dried Fruit Council
- Grupo de la industria
- International Sweeteners Association
- Organización sin fines de lucro
- Canadian Society of Endocrinology and Metabolism
- Gobierno
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research
- Gobierno
- Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada
- Universidad u hospital
- Banting and Best Diabetes Centre, University of Toronto
- Gobierno
- Instituto de Salud Carlos III
- Gobierno
- European Regional Development Fund
- Organización sin fines de lucro
- Obesity Canada
- Gobierno
- Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation
- Universidad u hospital
- Institute of Nutrition, Metabolism and Diabetes
- Organización sin fines de lucro
- Diabetes Canada Clinician Scientist
- Gobierno
- Spanish Ministry of Education, Culture, and Sports
Según 47 financiadores declarados.
Publicación
- Publicado
- 2020-11-06 · Am J Clin Nutr · vol. 113 · número 4 · págs. 960–971
- Editorial
- Elsevier BV
- Citado
- 48 citas · más que el 80% de estudios similares · 1.4× el promedio de su campo
- Referencias
- 54 trabajos
- Acceso
- Lectura gratuita
- Áreas de investigación
- Nuts composition and effects · Nutritional Studies and Diet · Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease
- Palabras clave
- nut consumption, type 2 diabetes, peanut butter, groundnut, tree nuts, Juglans regia, diabetes risk, dose-response relationship
- MeSH
- humans, nuts, diabetes mellitus, type 2, diet, feeding behavior
7 autores
- Nerea Becerra‐Tomás🇪🇸Universitat de València; Instituto de Salud Carlos III; Spanish Biomedical Research Centre in Physiopathology of Obesity and Nutrition; Institut de Recerca Biomèdica Catalunya Sud; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red; Universitat Rovira i Virgili
- Indira Paz‐Graniel🇪🇸Instituto de Salud Carlos III; Spanish Biomedical Research Centre in Physiopathology of Obesity and Nutrition; Institut de Recerca Biomèdica Catalunya Sud; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red; Universitat Rovira i Virgili
- Pablo Hernández‐Alonso🇪🇸 · autor de correspondenciaInstituto de Salud Carlos III; Spanish Biomedical Research Centre in Physiopathology of Obesity and Nutrition; Institut de Recerca Biomèdica Catalunya Sud; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red; Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Victoria; Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga; Universitat Rovira i Virgili
- David J.A. Jenkins🇨🇦St. Michael's Hospital; University of Toronto
- Cyril W.C. Kendall🇨🇦St. Michael's Hospital; University of Toronto; University of Saskatchewan
- John L. Sievenpiper🇨🇦St. Michael's Hospital; University of Toronto
- Jordi Salas‐Salvadó🇪🇸 · autor de correspondenciaInstituto de Salud Carlos III; Spanish Biomedical Research Centre in Physiopathology of Obesity and Nutrition; Institut de Recerca Biomèdica Catalunya Sud; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red; Hospital Universitari Sant Joan de Reus; Universitat Rovira i Virgili
Resumen
El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.
Background
Previous meta-analyses, with some methodological controversies, have assessed the relation between nut consumption and type 2 diabetes (T2D) risk and pointed to contradictory results, making desirable the performance of an updated meta-analysis.
Objectives
We aimed to systematically review and meta-analyze all the published studies investigating the relations of total nuts and different types of nuts-i.e., walnuts, peanuts, peanut butter, and total tree nuts-with the prevalence and incidence of T2D.
Methods
A systematic search was conducted in the PubMed and Cochrane databases through 12 August, 2020. The inverse variance method with fixed-effect models was used to pool data across studies, expressed as risk ratios (RRs) or ORs and 95% CIs for prospective cohort and cross-sectional studies, respectively. The Cochran Q test and I2 statistics were used to test and quantify heterogeneity, respectively. Dose-response meta-analysis was also conducted.
Results
Eight studies (5 prospective and 3 cross-sectional) were included in the quantitative synthesis. Meta-analyses of cross-sectional studies and prospective cohort studies, comparing the highest with the lowest categories, revealed a nonsignificant association between total nut consumption and T2D. Meta-analyses of prospective cohort studies showed an inverse association between peanut butter consumption and T2D incidence (RR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.77, 0.98; I2 = 50.6%; Pheterogeneity = 0.16), whereas no association was observed between peanuts or tree nuts and T2D. There was no evidence of a linear dose-response or nonlinear dose-response gradient for total nut and peanut consumption in prospective cohort studies. The certainty of the evidence using NutriGrade was very low for all the exposures.
Conclusions
Current results do not demonstrate an association of total nut, peanut, or tree nut consumption with T2D. Peanut butter consumption may be inversely associated with this disease.This review protocol was registered at www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/ as CRD42020149756.
Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.
Confianza de la comunidad
Cargando…
¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?
Comentarios
¿Algo está mal aquí?
Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.
Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.