Financiado en parte por AHDB Beef and Lamb
Associations between red meat, processed red meat and total red and processed red meat consumption, nutritional adequacy and markers of health and cardio-metabolic diseases in British adults: a cross-sectional analysis using data from UK National Diet and Nutrition Survey
Hobbs-Grimmer DA, Givens DI, Lovegrove JA
European journal of nutrition · 25 citas
Etiquetas de revisión
Vínculos de autores con la industriaFinanciado por la industriaDatos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.
Cómo se estudió
- Diseño
- Estudio transversal (indexado por PubMed)
- Estudiado en
- Personas
- Resultado principal
- Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento
- Consumo medido con
- Diarios o recordatorios de alimentación
Quién lo pagó
- Financiación
- Financiado por la industria
- Grupo de la industria
- AHDB Beef and Lamb
- Autores
- Al menos un autor declara un vínculo económico con la industria
Según 1 financiador declarado y la declaración de financiación del texto completo.
Publicación
- Publicado
- 2021-02-07 · Eur J Nutr · vol. 60 · número 6 · págs. 2979–2997
- Editorial
- Springer Science+Business Media
- Citado
- 29 citas · más que el 89% de estudios similares · 2.7× el promedio de su campo
- Referencias
- 35 trabajos
- Acceso
- Acceso abierto (revista híbrida) · CC-BY
- Áreas de investigación
- Meat and Animal Product Quality · Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact · Nutritional Studies and Diet
- Palabras clave
- Red meat, Medicine, Cross-sectional study, Body mass index, Internal medicine
- MeSH
- humans, metabolic diseases, diet, nutrition surveys, cross-sectional studies, eating, meat, adult, female, male, red meat, united kingdom
3 autores
- Ditte A. Hobbs🇬🇧University of Reading
- David Ian Givens🇬🇧University of Reading
- Julie Anne Lovegrove🇬🇧 · autor de correspondenciaUniversity of Reading
Resumen
El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.
Purpose
To determine the association between red meat (RM), processed red meat (PRM) and total red and processed red meat (TRPRM) consumption on nutritional adequacy and markers of health and cardio-metabolic diseases in British adults.
Methods
In this cross-sectional study of adults (19-64 y) from the National Diet and Nutrition Survey (NDNS) (n = 1758), RM and PRM consumption were assessed from 4 day estimated food diaries. Anthropometric measures, blood pressure (BP), pulse pressure (PP), plasma glucose, HbA1c, C-reactive protein, TAG, TC, LDL-C and HDL-C from the NDNS were used.
Results
43% of adults (men 57% and women 31%) consumed more than the 70 g/d TRPRM guidelines. Fewer adults in the highest tertile of TRPRM intake were below lower reference nutrient intakes (LRNIs), particularly for zinc and iron, respectively. In model 3 (controlled for age, energy intake, socioeconomic classification, number of daily cigarettes, BMI, dietary factors), higher RM consumption was associated with being significantly taller (model 3: P-ANCOVA = 0.006; P-T3/T1 = 0.0004) in men and lower diastolic BP (model 3: P-ANCOVA = 0.004; P-T3/T2 = 0.002) in women. Higher PRM in men was associated with significantly higher plasma ferritin concentration (model 3: P-ANCOVA = 0.0001; P-T2/T1 = 0.0001), being taller (P-ANCOVA = 0.019; P-T1/T2 = 0.047, T1/T3 = 0.044), increased body weight (model 3: P-ANCOVA = 0.001; P-T1/T3 = 0.0001), BMI (model 3: P-ANCOVA = 0.007; P-T1/T3 = 0.006) and smaller hip circumference (model 3: P-ANCOVA = 0.006; P-T3/T1 = 0.024; P-T2/T1 = 0.013) and in women significantly higher TC (model 3: P-ANCOVA = 0.020; P-T3/T2 = 0.016), LDL-C (P-ANCOVA = 0.030; P-T3/T2 = 0.025), HbA1c (model 3: P-ANCOVA = 0.0001; P-T2/T1 = 0.001; P-T3/T2 = 0.001) and higher PP (model 3: P-ANCOVA = 0.022; P-T3/T1 = 0.021). Higher PRM consumption was associated with significantly higher BMI and hip circumference in men, and higher TC, LDL-C, HbA1c and PP in women, which was not observed for RM consumption.
Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY).
Confianza de la comunidad
Cargando…
¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?
Comentarios
¿Algo está mal aquí?
Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.
Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.