Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Estudio2021Acceso abierto

Don't put all social network sites in one basket: Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, TikTok, and their relations with well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic

Masciantonio A, Bourguignon D, Bouchat P, Balty M, Rimé B

PloS one · 59 citas

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Estudio transversal (clasificado por nuestro filtro de IA)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente

Según la declaración de financiación del texto completo.

Publicación

Publicado
2021-03-11 · PLoS One · vol. 16 · número 3 · pág. e0248384
Editorial
Public Library of Science
Citado
198 citas · más que el 100% de estudios similares · 51.0× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
43 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (revista) · CC-BY
Áreas de investigación
Impact of Technology on Adolescents · Digital Mental Health Interventions · Media Influence and Health
Palabras clave
social network sites, well-being, COVID-19 pandemic, Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, TikTok, active vs passive social media use, social support, upward social comparison, envy, life satisfaction, negative affect, positive affect, quarantine
MeSH
humans, personal satisfaction, jealousy, motivation, quarantine, social support, adult, middle aged, female, male, young adult, pandemics, social media, social networking, covid-19

5 autores

  • Alexandra Masciantonio🇫🇷 · autor de correspondenciaPsychologie Ergonomique et Sociale pour l'Expérience Utilisateurs; Université de Lorraine
  • David Bourguignon🇫🇷Psychologie Ergonomique et Sociale pour l'Expérience Utilisateurs; Université de Lorraine
  • Pierre Bouchat🇫🇷Psychologie Ergonomique et Sociale pour l'Expérience Utilisateurs; Université de Lorraine
  • Manon Balty🇫🇷Psychologie Ergonomique et Sociale pour l'Expérience Utilisateurs; Université de Lorraine
  • Bernard Rimé🇧🇪UCLouvain

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Prior studies indicated that actively using social network sites (SNSs) is positively associated with well-being by enhancing social support and feelings of connectedness. Conversely, passively using SNSs is negatively associated with well-being by fostering upward social comparison and envy. However, the majority of these studies has focused on Facebook. The present research examined the relationships between well-being-satisfaction with life, negative affect, positive affect-and using actively or passively various SNSs-Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, TikTok-during the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition, two mediators were tested: social support and upward social comparison. One thousand four persons completed an online survey during the quarantine measures; the analyses employed structural equation modeling. Results showed that passive usage of Facebook is negatively related to well-being through upward social comparison, whereas active usage of Instagram is positively related to satisfaction with life and negative affect through social support. Furthermore, active usage of Twitter was positively related to satisfaction with life through social support; while passive usage was negatively related to upward social comparison, which, in turn, was associated with more negative affect. Finally, TikTok use was not associated with well-being. Results are discussed in line with SNSs' architectures and users' motivations. Future research is required to go beyond methodological and statistical limitations and allow generalization. This study concludes that SNSs must be differentiated to truly understand how they shape human interactions.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY).

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.