Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Ensayo controlado aleatorizado2021Acceso abierto

Time-Restricted Eating Improves Quality of Life Measures in Overweight Humans

Crose A, Alvear A, Singroy S, Wang Q, Manoogian E, Panda S, Mashek DG, Chow LS

Nutrients · 31 citas

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Ensayo controlado aleatorizado (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente
Gobierno
National Institutes of Health
Universidad u hospital
Healthy Foods, Healthy Lives Institute, University of Minnesota
Gobierno
National Cancer Institute
Gobierno
National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Gobierno
NCI NIH HHS
Gobierno
NIH HHS
Gobierno
NCATS NIH HHS
Subvenciones
National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences ((UL1-TR002494)); National Institutes of Health (NIH-R01); National Cancer Institute (P30 CA-014195); Healthy Foods, Healthy Lives Institute, University of Minnesota (17SFR-2YR50LC); National Institutes of Health (DK118278); National Institutes of Health (UL1‐TR‐002494); National Institutes of Health (AG065569)

Según 7 financiadores declarados y la declaración de financiación del texto completo.

Publicación

Publicado
2021-04-23 · Nutrients · vol. 13 · número 5 · pág. 1430
Editorial
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
Citado
35 citas · más que el 93% de estudios similares · 3.1× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
32 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (revista) · CC-BY
Áreas de investigación
Dietary Effects on Health · Circadian rhythm and melatonin · Diet and metabolism studies
Palabras clave
Overweight, Quality of life (healthcare), Medicine, Analysis of variance, Randomized controlled trial, Repeated measures design, Intervention (counseling), Post hoc, Weight loss, Obesity, Gerontology, Internal medicine, Psychiatry
MeSH
humans, weight loss, fasting, analysis of variance, quality of life, middle aged, overweight, surveys and questionnaires

8 autores

  • Ainslee Crose🇺🇸University of Minnesota
  • ALISON C. ALVEAR🇺🇸University of Minnesota
  • Stephanie Singroy🇺🇸University of Minnesota
  • Qi Wang🇺🇸University of Minnesota; Southern California Clinical and Translational Science Institute
  • Emily N. C. Manoogian🇺🇸Salk Institute for Biological Studies
  • Satchidananda Panda🇺🇸Salk Institute for Biological Studies
  • Douglas G. Mashek🇺🇸University of Minnesota
  • Lisa Senye Chow🇺🇸 · autor de correspondenciaUniversity of Minnesota

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Time-restricted eating (TRE) reduces weight in humans, but its effects on quality of life have not been well characterized. By performing a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial, we examined the effects of TRE (12-week intervention, 8 h eating window) vs. non-TRE (unrestricted eating) on quality of life (QoL) measures. Twenty subjects with overweight and prolonged eating window (mean (SD): 15.4 h (0.9)) were randomized to either 12 weeks of TRE (8 h eating window: (n = 11)) or non-TRE (n = 9). QoL data were collected with the 36-item Short Form Survey (SF-36) pre- and post-intervention. Given a two-way ANOVA model and post-hoc t-test analysis, the TRE group improved limitations due to emotional health post-intervention: +97.0 (10.0)) vs. baseline: +66.7 (42.2) (p = 0.02) and perceived change in health over the last year end intervention: +68.2 (16.2) vs. baseline: +52.3 (23.6) (p = 0.001) relative to baseline. The TRE group improved limitations due to emotional health TRE: +97.0 (10.0) vs. non-TRE: +55.6 (44.1) (p = 0.05) and perceived change in health (TRE: +68.2 (16.2) vs. non-TRE: +44.4 (31.6) (p = 0.04) relative to the non-TRE group at post-intervention (p < 0.025). In conclusion, 12 weeks of TRE does not adversely affect QoL and may be associated with modest improvements in QoL relative to baseline and unrestricted eating; these findings support future studies examining TRE compliance and durability.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY).

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.