Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Revisión sistemática2021Solo mecanismosAcceso abierto

The Neurophysiological Processing of Music in Children: A Systematic Review With Narrative Synthesis and Considerations for Clinical Practice in Music Therapy

Bower J, Magee WL, Catroppa C, Baker FA

Frontiers in psychology · 8 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Solo mecanismos

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Revisión sistemática (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Solo mecanismos

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente
Universidad u hospital
University of Melbourne

Según 1 financiador declarado y la declaración de financiación del texto completo.

Publicación

Publicado
2021-04-15 · Front Psychol · vol. 12 · pág. 615209
Editorial
Frontiers Media
Citado
21 citas · más que el 48% de estudios similares · 0.5× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
104 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (revista) · CC-BY
Áreas de investigación
Neuroscience and Music Perception · Music Therapy and Health · Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Palabras clave
acquired brain injury, disorder of consciousness, music therapy, auditory evoked potentials, infants and young children

4 autores

  • Janeen Bower🇦🇺 · autor de correspondenciaRoyal Children's Hospital; The University of Melbourne; Murdoch Children's Research Institute
  • Wendy L. Magee🇺🇸Temple University
  • Cathy Catroppa🇦🇺Royal Children's Hospital; The University of Melbourne; Murdoch Children's Research Institute
  • Felicity Anne Baker🇦🇺🇳🇴The University of Melbourne; Norwegian Academy of Music

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Introduction: Evidence supporting the use of music interventions to maximize arousal and awareness in adults presenting with a disorder of consciousness continues to grow. However, the brain of a child is not simply a small adult brain, and therefore adult theories are not directly translatable to the pediatric population. The present study aims to synthesize brain imaging data about the neural processing of music in children aged 0-18 years, to form a theoretical basis for music interventions with children presenting with a disorder of consciousness following acquired brain injury. Methods: We conducted a systematic review with narrative synthesis utilizing an adaptation of the methodology developed by Popay and colleagues. Following the development of the narrative that answered the central question "what does brain imaging data reveal about the receptive processing of music in children?", discussion was centered around the clinical implications of music therapy with children following acquired brain injury. Results: The narrative synthesis included 46 studies that utilized EEG, MEG, fMRI, and fNIRS scanning techniques in children aged 0-18 years. From birth, musical stimuli elicit distinct but immature electrical responses, with components of the auditory evoked response having longer latencies and variable amplitudes compared to their adult counterparts. Hemodynamic responses are observed throughout cortical and subcortical structures however cortical immaturity impacts musical processing and the localization of function in infants and young children. The processing of complex musical stimuli continues to mature into late adolescence. Conclusion: While the ability to process fundamental musical elements is present from birth, infants and children process music more slowly and utilize different cortical areas compared to adults. Brain injury in childhood occurs in a period of rapid development and the ability to process music following brain injury will likely depend on pre-morbid musical processing. Further, a significant brain injury may disrupt the developmental trajectory of complex music processing. However, complex music processing may emerge earlier than comparative language processing, and occur throughout a more global circuitry.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY).

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.