Egg consumption associated with all-cause mortality in rural China: a 14-year follow-up study
Liu L, Huang X, Wang B, Song Y, Lin T, Zhou Z, Guo H, Chen P, Yang Y, Ling W, Qin X, Tang G, Liu C, Li J, Zhang Y, Spence JD, Huo Y, Zhang H, Xu X
European journal of public health · 4 citas
Etiquetas de revisión
Cuestionario de frecuencia de consumoSin ajuste declarado por estilo de vidaDatos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.
Cómo se estudió
- Diseño
- Estudio de cohortes (indexado por PubMed)
- Estudiado en
- Personas
- Resultado principal
- Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte
- Consumo medido con
- Cuestionario de frecuencia de consumo
Quién lo pagó
- Financiación
- Financiación independiente
- Gobierno
- National Natural Science Foundation of China
- Gobierno
- National Key Research and Development Program of China
- Gobierno
- Economic, Trade and Information Commission of Shenzhen Municipality
- Gobierno
- National Key Research and Development Program
- Gobierno
- 111 project from the Education Ministry of China
- Gobierno
- Science, Technology and Innovation Committee of Shenzhen
- Gobierno
- Major projects of the Science and Technology Department, Jiangxi
- Universidad u hospital
- Outstanding Youths Development Scheme of Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University
- Organización sin fines de lucro
- Jiangxi Outstanding Person Foundation
- Gobierno
- Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangzhou, China
- Subvenciones
- National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018ZX09301034003); National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018ZX09739010); National Natural Science Foundation of China (81973133); National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFE0205400); National Natural Science Foundation of China (81730019); National Natural Science Foundation of China (81500233); National Natural Science Foundation of China (81960074)
Según 10 financiadores declarados.
Publicación
- Publicado
- 2020-12-23 · Eur J Public Health · vol. 31 · número 3 · págs. 613–618
- Editorial
- Oxford University Press
- Citado
- 6 citas · más que el 75% de estudios similares · 0.7× el promedio de su campo
- Referencias
- 34 trabajos
- Acceso
- De pago
- Áreas de investigación
- Nutritional Studies and Diet · Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet · Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
- Palabras clave
- Medicine, Body mass index, Demography, Cohort study, Cohort, Population, Environmental health, Internal medicine
- MeSH
- humans, diet, risk factors, cohort studies, follow-up studies, eggs, adult, china
19 autores
- Lishun Liu🇨🇳Shenzhen Genoimmune Medical Institute; Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Food Nutrition and Human Health; China Agricultural University
- Xiao Bo Huang🇨🇳Nanchang University; Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University
- Binyan Wang🇨🇳Anhui Medical University; Nanfang Hospital; Shenzhen Genoimmune Medical Institute; Southern Medical University
- Yun Kyoung Song🇨🇳Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Food Nutrition and Human Health; China Agricultural University
- Teng-Fei Lin🇨🇳Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Food Nutrition and Human Health; China Agricultural University
- Ziyi Zhou🇨🇳Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Food Nutrition and Human Health; China Agricultural University
- Huiyuan Guo🇨🇳Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Food Nutrition and Human Health; China Agricultural University
- Ping Chen🇨🇳Jinan University
- Yan Yang🇨🇳Sun Yat-sen University
- Wenhua Ling🇨🇳Sun Yat-sen University
- Xianhui Qin🇨🇳Anhui Medical University; Nanfang Hospital; Southern Medical University
- Genfu Tang🇨🇳Anhui Medical University
- Chengzhang Liu🇨🇳Shenzhen Genoimmune Medical Institute
- Jianping Li🇨🇳Peking University; Peking University First Hospital
- Yan Zhang🇨🇳Peking University; Peking University First Hospital
- J. David Spence🇨🇦Western University; Robarts Research Institute
- Yong Huo🇨🇳Peking University; Peking University First Hospital
- Hao Zhang🇨🇳 · autor de correspondenciaBeijing Advanced Innovation Center for Food Nutrition and Human Health; China Agricultural University
- Xiping Xu🇨🇳Anhui Medical University; Nanfang Hospital; Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Food Nutrition and Human Health; China Agricultural University; Southern Medical University
Resumen
El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.
Background
Dietary recommendations regarding egg intake remain controversial topic for public health. We hypothesized that there was a positive association between egg consumption and all-cause mortality.
Methods
To test this hypothesis, we enrolled 9885 adults from a community-based cohort in Anhui Province, China during 2003-05. Egg consumption was assessed by food questionnaire. Stratified analyses were performed for age, sex, body mass index (BMI), blood pressure, smoking, drinking and laboratory tests.
Results
After an average follow-up of 14.1 years, 9444 participants were included for analysis. A total of 814 deaths were recorded. Participants' BMI and lipid profile had no significantly difference between three egg consumption groups. BMI was 21.6±2.7 of the whole population, especially BMI>24 was only 17.3%. A bivariate association of egg consumption >6/week with increased all-cause mortality was observed compared with ≤6/week (RR: 1.35, 95% CI: 1.05, 1.73, P = 0.018). A significant interaction was observed for BMI ≥ 21.2 kg/m2 vs. BMI<21.2 kg/m2 (P for interaction: 0.001). No other significant interactions were found.
Conclusions
In this study, consuming >6 eggs/week increased risk of all-cause mortality, even among lean participants, especially who with BMI ≥ 21.2 kg/m2. Eggs are an easily accessible and constitute an affordable food source in underdeveloped regions. Consuming <6 eggs/week may be the most suitable intake mode.
Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.
Confianza de la comunidad
Cargando…
¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?
Comentarios
¿Algo está mal aquí?
Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.
Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.