Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Metaanálisis2021Acceso abierto

Music intervention for sleep quality in critically ill and surgical patients: a meta-analysis

Kakar E, Venema E, Jeekel J, Klimek M, van der Jagt M

BMJ open · 29 citas

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Metaanálisis (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente

Según la declaración de financiación del texto completo.

Publicación

Publicado
2021-05-01 · BMJ Open · vol. 11 · número 5 · pág. e042510
Editorial
BMJ
Citado
53 citas · más que el 89% de estudios similares · 2.2× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
107 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (revista) · CC-BY
Áreas de investigación
Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders · Music Therapy and Health · Infant Development and Preterm Care
Palabras clave
Medicine, Meta-analysis, MEDLINE, Psychological intervention, Music therapy, Population, Randomized controlled trial, Subgroup analysis, Physical therapy, Cochrane Library, Internal medicine, Psychiatry
MeSH
humans, critical illness, music therapy, sleep, mental disorders, music, adult

5 autores

  • Ellaha Kakar🇳🇱 · autor de correspondenciaErasmus MC; Erasmus University Rotterdam
  • Esmée Venema🇳🇱Maastricht University
  • J Jeekel🇳🇱Erasmus MC; Erasmus University Rotterdam
  • Markus Klimek🇳🇱Erasmus MC; Erasmus University Rotterdam
  • Mathieu van der Jagt🇳🇱Erasmus MC; Erasmus University Rotterdam

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Objective

Sleep disruption occurs frequently in hospitalised patients. Given the potential of music intervention as a non-pharmacological measure to improve sleep quality, we aimed to assess and quantify current literature on the effect of recorded music interventions on sleep quality and quantity in the adult critical care and surgical populations.

Design

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Data sources

Embase, MEDLINE Ovid, Cochrane Central, Web of Science and Google Scholar.

Eligibility criteria for studies

Randomised controlled trials assessing the effect of music on sleep quality in critically ill and surgical patients.

Methods

The electronic databases were systematically searched from 1 January 1981 to 27 January 2020. Data were screened, extracted and appraised by two independent reviewers. Primary outcomes were sleep quality and quantity, assessed with validated tools. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed. Random effects meta-analysis was performed, and pooled standardised mean differences (SMDs) with 95% CIs were reported.

Results

Five studies (259 patients) were included in qualitative (risk of bias) and quantitative analysis (meta-analysis). Pooled data showed a significant effect of recorded music on subjective sleep quality in the critical care and surgical population (SMD=1.21 (95% CI 0.50 to 1.91), p<0.01, excluding one non-English study; SMD=0.87 (95% CI 0.45 to 1.29), p<0.01). The SMD of 1.21 corresponded to a 27.1% (95% CI 11.2 to 42.8) increase in subjective sleep quality using validated questionnaires. A significant increase in subjective sleep quantity of 36 min was found in one study. Objective measurements of sleep assessed in one study using polysomnography showed significant increase in deeper sleep stage in the music group.

Conclusions

Recorded music showed a significant improvement in subjective sleep quality in some critical care and surgical populations. Therefore, its use may be relevant to improve sleep, but given the moderate potential for bias, further research is needed.

Prospero registration number

CRD42020167783.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY).

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.