Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Metaanálisis2021Financiación no declarada

Blueberry intervention improves metabolic syndrome risk factors: systematic review and meta-analysis

Carvalho MF, Lucca ABA, Ribeiro E Silva VR, Macedo LR, Silva M

Nutrition research (New York, N.Y.) · 14 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Financiación no declarada

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Metaanálisis (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento
Consumo medido con
No se indica

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación no declarada

Publicación

Publicado
2021-05-21 · Nutr Res · vol. 91 · págs. 67–80
Editorial
Elsevier BV
Citado
22 citas · más que el 63% de estudios similares · 0.9× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
82 trabajos
Acceso
De pago
Áreas de investigación
Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities · Natural Antidiabetic Agents Studies · Psidium guajava Extracts and Applications
Palabras clave
Meta-analysis, Medicine, Randomized controlled trial, Glycemic, Internal medicine, Placebo, Metabolic syndrome, Confidence interval, Lipid profile, Relative risk, Blood pressure, Cochrane Library, Anthropometry, Cholesterol, Obesity, Insulin
MeSH
humans, fruit, blood glucose, lipids, plant extracts, phytotherapy, risk factors, blood pressure, dietary supplements, blueberry plants, metabolic syndrome

5 autores

  • Marina Fernandes Carvalho🇧🇷Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora
  • Ana Beatriz Araújo Lucca🇧🇷Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora
  • Vítor Rodrigues Ribeiro E Silva🇧🇷Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora
  • Leandro Roberto de Macedo🇧🇷Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora
  • Maísa Silva🇧🇷 · autor de correspondenciaUniversidade Federal de Juiz de Fora

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Recent studies have found that blueberry supplementation can improve parameters related to metabolic syndrome (MetS); however, there is no definitive consensus. Analysis of several randomized controlled trials can demonstrate whether a reduced effect of MetS risk factors is more pronounced in individuals who received supplementation with blueberry than in individuals who did not receive this supplementation. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effect of blueberry intervention on MetS risk factors, including blood pressure, anthropometric measurements, and glycemic and lipid profiles. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and SciELO were systematically searched to identify relevant studies published before July 2020. To compare the effects of blueberry supplements (powder, extract, fruit, juice, or frozen) with placebo, the mean differences with 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were pooled based on the random-effects model. We classified the quality of evidence according to the GRADE approach. In total, 18 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in this systematic review, and 12 studies were selected for meta-analysis. Based on the Cochrane Collaboration risk-of-bias tool, all studies were of good quality. These trials differed with regards to blueberry dosage and forms, recruited subjects, and trial duration. Meta-analyses of the data showed that blueberry intervention had a significant effect on lipid levels, decreasing total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels. We found no significant differences in the glycemic status markers and anthropometric measurements. Blueberry supplementation significantly decreased diastolic blood pressure. In conclusion, the meta-analysis showed that blueberry may be efficacious in the treatment of MetS, due to its beneficial effects on lipid and blood pressure markers.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.