Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Revisión sistemática2021Financiación no declarada

[Probabilistic Risk Assessment of Arsenic Exposure Through Drinking Water Intake in Chinese Residents]

Qin N, Liu YW, Hou R, Wang CY, Wang BB, Duan XL

Huan jing ke xue= Huanjing kexue · 3 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Financiación no declarada

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Revisión sistemática (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Sin resultado de salud

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación no declarada

Publicación

Publicado
2021-07-08 · Huan Jing Ke Xue · vol. 42 · número 7 · págs. 3338–3347
Editorial
National Institutes of Health
Citado
2 citas · más que el 61% de estudios similares · 0.3× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
0 trabajos
Acceso
De pago
Áreas de investigación
Human Health and Disease · Fluoride Effects and Removal
Palabras clave
Arsenic, Environmental health, Arsenic contamination of groundwater, Environmental science, Risk assessment, Probabilistic logic, Environmental chemistry, Medicine, Statistics, Chemistry, Mathematics, Computer science, Computer security
MeSH
arsenic, water pollutants, chemical, risk assessment, environmental exposure, china, drinking water

6 autores

  • Ning Qin🇨🇳Beijing Drainage Group (China); University of Science and Technology Beijing
  • Yun-Wei Liu🇨🇳University of Science and Technology Beijing
  • Rong Hou🇨🇳University of Science and Technology Beijing
  • Cai-Yun Wang🇨🇳Beijing Drainage Group (China)
  • Bei-Bei Wang🇨🇳University of Science and Technology Beijing
  • Xiao-Li Duan🇨🇳University of Science and Technology Beijing

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

The total arsenic concentrations of the three main drinking water types in China were determined through a systematic literature review. The distribution models of drinking water exposure parameters for different age groups were obtained using the regression method. The carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic risks of different population groups caused by arsenic exposure through different drinking water types were evaluated by a probabilistic risk assessment. The results showed that the geometric mean of total arsenic content in all the drinking water samples in China was (13.0±38.1) μg·L-1. The highest arsenic content was found in the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, followed by Guangxi and Shanxi. Based on the relevant standards for drinking water quality, the probability exceeding the threshold value of groundwater and source water is 23.2% and 18.4%, respectively. According to the results of non-carcinogenic risk assessment, the probability of the residents drinking well water and surface water from the water source area exceeding the daily average exposure dose threshold was 24.0% and 19.5%, respectively. According to the carcinogenic risk assessment, the median of carcinogenic risk caused by arsenic in drinking water in China was 3.22×10-5, which is acceptable. The population group of 18-45 years old had the highest risk, and the median LCR was 1.37×10-5. There was still a certain probability that the LCR of drinking well water and surface water would exceed the acceptable risk level recommended by the US EPA. In conclusion, the potential health risks caused by arsenic exposure through drinking water intake exist among Chinese residents. Further control of the arsenic concentration in drinking water is required to reduce the health risk and improve the safety of drinking water. Meanwhile, it is suggested to strengthen the research on risk threshold to provide a scientific basis for the residents' health protection.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.