Ultra-Processed Food Availability and Noncommunicable Diseases: A Systematic Review
de Araújo TP, de Moraes MM, Magalhães V, Afonso C, Santos C, Rodrigues SSP
International journal of environmental research and public health · 36 citas
Etiquetas de revisión
Financiación no declaradaDatos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.
Cómo se estudió
- Diseño
- Revisión sistemática (indexado por PubMed)
- Estudiado en
- Personas
- Resultado principal
- Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento
- Consumo medido con
- No se indica
Quién lo pagó
- Financiación
- Financiación no declarada
Publicación
- Publicado
- 2021-07-10 · Int J Environ Res Public Health · vol. 18 · número 14 · pág. 7382
- Editorial
- Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
- Citado
- 51 citas · más que el 84% de estudios similares · 1.8× el promedio de su campo
- Referencias
- 51 trabajos
- Acceso
- Acceso abierto (revista) · CC-BY
- Áreas de investigación
- Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling · Consumer Packaging Perceptions and Trends · Nutritional Studies and Diet
- Palabras clave
- Environmental health, Medicine, Scopus, Overweight, Obesity, Population, Systematic review, Scale (ratio), MEDLINE, Gerontology, Geography
- MeSH
- humans, obesity, diet, food handling, fast foods, noncommunicable diseases
6 autores
- Taissa Pereira de Araújo🇵🇹 · autor de correspondenciaUniversidade do Porto
- Milena Miranda de Moraes🇵🇹Universidade do Porto
- Vânia Magalhães🇵🇹Universidade do Porto
- Cláudia Afonso🇵🇹Universidade do Porto
- Cristina Santos🇵🇹Universidade do Porto; Centre for Health Technology and Services Research
- Sara Rodrigues🇵🇹Universidade do Porto
Resumen
El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.
Ultra-processed food (UPF) can be harmful to the population's health. To establish associations between UPF and health outcomes, food consumption can be assessed using availability data, such as purchase lists or household budget surveys. The aim of this systematic review was to search studies that related UPF availability with noncommunicable diseases or their risk factors. PRISMA guidelines were used. Searches were performed in PubMed, EBSCO, Scopus and Web of Science in February 2021. The search strategy included terms related to exposure (UPF) and outcomes (noncommunicable diseases and their risk factors). Studies that assessed only food consumption at an individual level and did not present health outcomes were excluded. Two reviewers conducted the selection process, and a third helped when disagreement occurred. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess the studies' quality; 998 records were analyzed. All 11 eligible studies were ecological and assessed overweight and obesity as a health outcome, only one showed no positive association with UPF availability. Two studies included the prevalence of diabetes as an outcome, however no significant association was found with UPF availability. Studies relating UPF availability and health outcomes are focused on overweight and obesity. It is necessary to further explore the relationship between other health outcomes and UPF availability using purchase or sales data.
Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY).
Confianza de la comunidad
Cargando…
¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?
Comentarios
¿Algo está mal aquí?
Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.
Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.