Consumption of red meat and processed meat and cancer incidence: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies
Farvid MS, Sidahmed E, Spence ND, Mante Angua K, Rosner BA, Barnett JB
European journal of epidemiology · 336 citas
Etiquetas de revisión
Financiación no declaradaDatos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.
Cómo se estudió
- Diseño
- Metaanálisis (indexado por PubMed)
- Estudiado en
- Personas
- Resultado principal
- Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte
- Consumo medido con
- No se indica
Quién lo pagó
- Financiación
- Financiación no declarada
Publicación
- Publicado
- 2021-08-29 · Eur J Epidemiol · vol. 36 · número 9 · págs. 937–951
- Editorial
- Springer Science+Business Media
- Citado
- 455 citas · más que el 100% de estudios similares · 16.3× el promedio de su campo
- Impacto
- Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
- Referencias
- 256 trabajos
- Acceso
- De pago
- Áreas de investigación
- Nutritional Studies and Diet · Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease · Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
- Palabras clave
- Medicine, Red meat, Relative risk, Colorectal cancer, Breast cancer, Meta-analysis, Cancer, Lung cancer, Internal medicine, Incidence (geometry), Prospective cohort study, Processed meat, Confidence interval, Pathology, Food science
- MeSH
- humans, neoplasms, prospective studies, female, red meat
6 autores
- Maryam Sadat Farvid🇺🇸 · autor de correspondenciaHarvard University
- Elkhansa Sidahmed🇺🇸Harvard University
- Nicholas D. Spence🇨🇦University of Toronto
- Kingsly Mante Angua🇺🇸Montgomery College
- BERNARD A. ROSNER🇺🇸Brigham and Women's Hospital; Harvard University
- Junaidah Bajrai Barnett🇺🇸Harvard University
Resumen
El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.
Red meat and processed meat consumption has been hypothesized to increase risk of cancer, but the evidence is inconsistent. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies to summarize the evidence of associations between consumption of red meat (unprocessed), processed meat, and total red and processed meat with the incidence of various cancer types. We searched in MEDLINE and EMBASE databases through December 2020. Using a random-effect meta-analysis, we calculated the pooled relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of the highest versus the lowest category of red meat, processed meat, and total red and processed meat consumption in relation to incidence of various cancers. We identified 148 published articles. Red meat consumption was significantly associated with greater risk of breast cancer (RR = 1.09; 95% CI = 1.03-1.15), endometrial cancer (RR = 1.25; 95% CI = 1.01-1.56), colorectal cancer (RR = 1.10; 95% CI = 1.03-1.17), colon cancer (RR = 1.17; 95% CI = 1.09-1.25), rectal cancer (RR = 1.22; 95% CI = 1.01-1.46), lung cancer (RR = 1.26; 95% CI = 1.09-1.44), and hepatocellular carcinoma (RR = 1.22; 95% CI = 1.01-1.46). Processed meat consumption was significantly associated with a 6% greater breast cancer risk, an 18% greater colorectal cancer risk, a 21% greater colon cancer risk, a 22% greater rectal cancer risk, and a 12% greater lung cancer risk. Total red and processed meat consumption was significantly associated with greater risk of colorectal cancer (RR = 1.17; 95% CI = 1.08-1.26), colon cancer (RR = 1.21; 95% CI = 1.09-1.34), rectal cancer (RR = 1.26; 95% CI = 1.09-1.45), lung cancer (RR = 1.20; 95% CI = 1.09-1.33), and renal cell cancer (RR = 1.19; 95% CI = 1.04-1.37). This comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis study showed that high red meat intake was positively associated with risk of breast cancer, endometrial cancer, colorectal cancer, colon cancer, rectal cancer, lung cancer, and hepatocellular carcinoma, and high processed meat intake was positively associated with risk of breast, colorectal, colon, rectal, and lung cancers. Higher risk of colorectal, colon, rectal, lung, and renal cell cancers were also observed with high total red and processed meat consumption.
Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.
Confianza de la comunidad
Cargando…
¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?
Comentarios
¿Algo está mal aquí?
Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.
Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.