Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Metaanálisis2021

Effect of Long-Term Marine ɷ-3 Fatty Acids Supplementation on the Risk of Atrial Fibrillation in Randomized Controlled Trials of Cardiovascular Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Gencer B, Djousse L, Al-Ramady OT, Cook NR, Manson JE, Albert CM

Circulation · 113 citas

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Metaanálisis (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente
Gobierno
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Gobierno
National Cancer Institute
Gobierno
National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health
Gobierno
NCCIH NIH HHS
Gobierno
NCI NIH HHS
Gobierno
NHLBI NIH HHS
Subvenciones
National Cancer Institute (U01CA138962); National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01 HL116690); National Cancer Institute (R01CA138962); National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (R01AT011729)

Según 6 financiadores declarados.

Publicación

Publicado
2021-10-07 · Circulation · vol. 144 · número 25 · págs. 1981–1990
Editorial
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Citado
150 citas · más que el 97% de estudios similares · 4.4× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
30 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (revista híbrida) · PUBLIC-DOMAIN
Áreas de investigación
Fatty Acid Research and Health · Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes · Cardiac Health and Mental Health
Palabras clave
marine omega-3 fatty acids, omega-3 supplementation, atrial fibrillation, atrial fibrillation risk, dose-response relationship, cardiovascular outcomes, randomized controlled trials, cardiovascular disease prevention, omega-3 deficiency
MeSH
animals, fishes, humans, cardiovascular diseases, atrial fibrillation, fatty acids, omega-3, treatment outcome, risk factors, dietary supplements, aged, female, male

6 autores

  • Bariş Gencer🇨🇭University of Bern; University Hospital of Geneva
  • Luc Djoussé🇺🇸Brigham and Women's Hospital
  • Omar T. Al-Ramady🇺🇸Brigham and Women's Hospital
  • Nancy R. Cook🇺🇸Brigham and Women's Hospital; Harvard University
  • JoAnn E. Manson🇺🇸Brigham and Women's Hospital; Harvard University
  • Christine M. Albert🇺🇸 · autor de correspondenciaCedars-Sinai Medical Center; Cedars-Sinai Smidt Heart Institute

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Background

Some, but not all, large-scale randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the effects of marine ɷ-3 fatty acids supplementation on cardiovascular outcomes have reported increased risks of atrial fibrillation (AF). The potential reasons for disparate findings may be dose-related.

Methods

The MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched for articles and abstracts published between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2020, in addition to a meta-analysis of large cardiovascular RCTs published in 2019. RCTs of cardiovascular outcomes of marine ɷ-3 fatty acids that reported results for AF, either as a prespecified outcome, an adverse event, or a cause for hospitalization, with a minimum sample size of 500 patients and a median follow-up of at least 1 year were included. RCTs specifically examining shorter-term effects of ɷ-3 fatty acids on recurrent AF in patients with established AF or postoperative AF were not included. The hazard ratio (HR) for the reported AF outcomes within each trial was meta-analyzed using random effects model with Knapp-Hartung adjustment and evaluated a dose-response relationship with a meta-regression model.

Results

Of 4049 screened records, 7 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Of those, 5 were already detected in a previous meta-analysis of cardiovascular RCTs. Among the 81 210 patients from 7 trials, 58 939 (72.6%) were enrolled in trials testing ≤1 g/d and 22 271 (27.4%) in trials testing >1 g/d of ɷ-3 fatty acids. The mean age was 65 years, and 31 842 (39%) were female. The weighted average follow-up was 4.9 years. In meta-analysis, the use of marine ɷ-3 fatty acid supplements was associated with an increased risk of AF (n=2905; HR, 1.25 [95% CI, 1.07-1.46]; P=0.013). In analyses stratified by dose, the HR was greater in the trials testing >1 g/d (HR, 1.49 [95% CI, 1.04-2.15]; P=0.042) compared with those testing ≤1 g/d (HR, 1.12 [95% CI, 1.03-1.22]; P=0.024; P for interaction P=0.001).

Conclusions

In RCTs examining cardiovascular outcomes, marine ɷ-3 supplementation was associated with an increased risk of AF. The risk appeared to be greater in trials testing >1 g/d.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.