Financiado en parte por American Egg Board
Egg intake moderates the rate of memory decline in healthy older adults
Lee GJ, Oda K, Morton KR, Orlich M, Sabate J
Journal of nutritional science · 10 citas
Etiquetas de revisión
Cuestionario de frecuencia de consumoFinanciado por la industriaSin ajuste declarado por estilo de vidaDatos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.
Cómo se estudió
- Diseño
- Estudio transversal (indexado por PubMed)
- Estudiado en
- Personas
- Resultado principal
- Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento
- Consumo medido con
- Cuestionario de frecuencia de consumo
Quién lo pagó
- Financiación
- Financiado por la industria
- Gobierno
- National Institute on Aging
- Gobierno
- National Cancer Institute
- Gobierno
- NIA NIH HHS
- Gobierno
- NCI NIH HHS
- Grupo de la industria
- American Egg Board
- Subvenciones
- National Cancer Institute (U01 CA152939); National Institute on Aging (R01 AG026348)
Según 5 financiadores declarados y la declaración de financiación del texto completo.
Publicación
- Publicado
- 2021-01-01 · J Nutr Sci · vol. 10 · pág. e79
- Editorial
- Cambridge University Press
- Citado
- 15 citas · más que el 86% de estudios similares · 1.9× el promedio de su campo
- Referencias
- 35 trabajos
- Acceso
- Acceso abierto (revista) · CC-BY-NC-ND
- Áreas de investigación
- Nutritional Studies and Diet · Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling · Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
- Palabras clave
- California Verbal Learning Test, Medicine, Fish <Actinopterygii>, Cognitive decline, Body mass index, Demography, Verbal memory, Gerontology, Cognition, Biology, Internal medicine, Disease
- MeSH
- humans, memory disorders, diet, cross-sectional studies, cognition, eggs, aged, middle aged
5 autores
- Grace J. Lee🇺🇸 · autor de correspondenciaLoma Linda University
- Keiji Oda🇺🇸Loma Linda University
- Kelly R. Morton🇺🇸Loma Linda University
- Michael J. Orlich🇺🇸Loma Linda University
- Joan Sabaté🇺🇸Loma Linda University
Resumen
El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.
Eggs contain important compounds related to enhanced cognition, but it is not clear if egg consumption, as a whole, has a direct impact on memory decline in older adults. This study aimed to determine whether egg intake levels predict the rate of memory decline in healthy older adults after sociodemographic and dietary controls. We conducted a secondary analysis of data from 470 participants, age 50 and over, from the Biospsychosocial Religion and Health Study. Participants completed a food frequency questionnaire, which was used to calculate egg intake and divide participants into Low (<23 g/week, about half an egg), Intermediate (24-63 g/week, half to 1½ eggs) and High (≥63 g/week, about two or more eggs) tertiles. Participants were administered the California Verbal Learning Test - 2nd Edition (CVLT-II) Short Form in 2006-2007, and 294 of them were again tested in 2010-2011. Using linear mixed model analysis, no significant cross-sectional differences were observed in CVLT-II performance between egg intake levels after controlling for age, sex, race, education, body mass index, cardiovascular risk, depression and intake of meat, fish, dairy and fruits/vegetables. Longitudinally, the Intermediate egg group exhibited significantly slower rates of decline on the CVLT-II compared to the Low egg group. The High egg group also exhibited slower rates of decline, but not statistically significant. Thus, limited consumption of eggs (about 1 egg/week) was associated with slower memory decline in late life compared to consuming little to no eggs, but a dose-response effect was not clearly evident. This study may help explain discrepancies in previous research that did not control for other dietary intakes and risk factors.
Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY-NC-ND).
Confianza de la comunidad
Cargando…
¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?
Comentarios
¿Algo está mal aquí?
Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.
Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.