Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Detected in Processed Meats Cause Genetic Changes in Colorectal Cancers
Cheng T, Chaousis S, Kodagoda Gamage SM, Lam AK, Gopalan V
International journal of molecular sciences · 14 citas
Etiquetas de revisión
Solo mecanismosDatos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.
Cómo se estudió
- Diseño
- Estudio in vitro o de mecanismos (clasificado por nuestro filtro de IA)
- Estudiado en
- Células o muestras de laboratorio
- Resultado principal
- Solo mecanismos
Quién lo pagó
- Financiación
- Financiación independiente
Según la declaración de financiación del texto completo.
Publicación
- Publicado
- 2021-10-11 · Int J Mol Sci · vol. 22 · número 20 · pág. 10959
- Editorial
- Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
- Citado
- 22 citas · más que el 76% de estudios similares · 1.3× el promedio de su campo
- Referencias
- 40 trabajos
- Acceso
- Acceso abierto (revista) · CC-BY
- Áreas de investigación
- Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals · Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact · Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
- Palabras clave
- Pyrene, KRAS, Chemistry, Phenanthrene, Carcinogen, Food science, Colorectal cancer, Gene expression, Benzo(a)pyrene, Carcinogenesis, Molecular biology, Gene, Biology, Environmental chemistry, Cancer, Biochemistry, Genetics
- MeSH
- cell line, tumor, humans, colorectal neoplasms, benzo(a)pyrene, adenomatous polyposis coli protein, gene expression regulation, meat, meat products, tumor suppressor protein p53, proto-oncogene proteins p21(ras), gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, cooking, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
5 autores
- Tracie T. Cheng🇦🇺Griffith University
- Stephanie Chaousis🇦🇺Griffith University
- Sujani Madhurika Kodagoda Gamage🇱🇰🇦🇺University of Peradeniya; Griffith University
- Alfred King-yin Lam🇦🇺 · autor de correspondenciaGriffith University
- Vinod Gopalan🇦🇺 · autor de correspondenciaGriffith University
Resumen
El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are commonly ingested via meat and are produced from high-temperature cooking of meat. Some of these PAHs have potential roles in carcinogenesis of colorectal cancer (CRC). We aimed to investigate PAH concentrations in eight types of commonly consumed ready-to-eat meat samples and their potential effects on gene expressions related to CRC. Extraction and clean-up of meat samples were performed using QuEChERS method, and PAHs were detected using GC-MS. Nine different PAHs were found in meat samples. Interestingly, roast turkey contained the highest total PAH content, followed by salami meat. Hams of varying levels of smokedness showed a proportional increase of phenanthrene (PHEN), anthracene (ANTH), and fluorene (FLU). Triple-smoked ham samples showed significantly higher levels of these PAHs compared to single-smoked ham. These three PAHs plus benzo[a]pyrene (B[a]P), being detected in three meat samples, were chosen as treatments to investigate in vitro gene expression changes in human colon cells. After PAH treatment, total RNA was extracted and rtPCR was performed, investigating gene expression related to CRC. B[a]P decreased mRNA expression of TP53. In addition, at high concentrations, B[a]P significantly increased KRAS expression. Treatments with 1 µM PHEN, 25 µM, and 10 µM FLU significantly increased KRAS mRNA expression in vitro, implying the potential basis for PAH-induced colorectal carcinogenesis. Opposingly, the ANTH treatment led to increased TP53 and APC expression and decreased KRAS expression, suggesting an anti-carcinogenic effect. To conclude, PAHs are common in ready-to-eat meat samples and are capable of significantly modifying the expression of key genes related to CRC.
Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY).
Confianza de la comunidad
Cargando…
¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?
Comentarios
¿Algo está mal aquí?
Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.
Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.