Global red and processed meat trade and non-communicable diseases
Chung MG, Li Y, Liu J
BMJ global health · 29 citas
Etiquetas de revisión
Sin ajuste declarado por estilo de vidaDatos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.
Cómo se estudió
- Diseño
- Estudio transversal (clasificado por nuestro filtro de IA)
- Estudiado en
- Personas
- Resultado principal
- Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte
- Consumo medido con
- No se indica
Quién lo pagó
- Financiación
- Financiación independiente
- Gobierno
- National Science Foundation
- Gobierno
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration
- Universidad u hospital
- Michigan State University
- Universidad u hospital
- College of Engineering, Michigan State University
Según 4 financiadores declarados.
Publicación
- Publicado
- 2021-10-01 · BMJ Glob Health · vol. 6 · número 11 · pág. e006394
- Editorial
- BMJ
- Citado
- 41 citas · más que el 97% de estudios similares · 6.3× el promedio de su campo
- Impacto
- Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
- Referencias
- 49 trabajos
- Acceso
- Acceso abierto (revista) · CC-BY-NC
- Áreas de investigación
- Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology · Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact · Nutritional Studies and Diet
- Palabras clave
- Red meat, Consumption (sociology), Business, Processed meat, Environmental health, International trade, Medicine, Food science, Biology
- MeSH
- humans, diet, health policy, meat, noncommunicable diseases, disability-adjusted life years
3 autores
- Min Gon Chung🇺🇸 · autor de correspondenciaUniversity of California, Merced; Michigan State University
- Yingjie Li🇦🇹🇺🇸International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis; Michigan State University
- Jianguo Liu🇺🇸Michigan State University
Resumen
El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.
Introduction
Rapid increases in the trade of global red and processed meat impede international efforts toward sustainable diets by increasing meat consumption. However, little research has examined cross-country variations in diet-related non-communicable diseases (NCDs) because of meat trade. We aimed to examine the impact of red and processed meat trade on diet-related NCDs and to identify which countries are particularly vulnerable to diet-related NCDs due to red and processed meat trade.
Methods
By selecting 14 red meat and six processed meat items, we investigated bilateral meat trade flows across 154 countries. Then, we integrated health data and information on red and processed meat trade to quantify the country-specific burden of diet-related NCDs attributable to the meat trade using a comparative risk assessment framework.
Results
Results show that global increases in red and processed meat trade contributed to the abrupt increase of diet-related NCDs, and the attributable burden of diet-related NCDs had large geographical variations among countries. We also identified responsible exporting countries that increase diet-related NCD risks in importing countries. Over the period from 1993 to 2018, island countries in the Caribbean and Oceania were particularly vulnerable to diet-related NCD incidents and mortality due to large meat imports. In addition, countries in Northern and Eastern Europe have exceedingly increased attributable death and disability-adjusted life year rates via meat imports.
Conclusion
Our findings suggest that both exporters and importers must urgently undertake cross-sectoral actions to reduce the meat trade's health impacts. To prevent unintended health consequences due to red and processed meat trade, future interventions need to integrate health policies with agricultural and trade policies by cooperating with both responsible exporting and importing countries.
Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY-NC).
Confianza de la comunidad
Cargando…
¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?
Comentarios
¿Algo está mal aquí?
Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.
Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.