Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Ensayo controlado aleatorizado2022

Effect of Repeated Low-Level Red-Light Therapy for Myopia Control in Children: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

Jiang Y, Zhu Z, Tan X, Kong X, Zhong H, Zhang J, Xiong R, Yuan Y, Zeng J, Morgan IG, He M

Ophthalmology · 249 citas

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Ensayo controlado aleatorizado (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente
Gobierno
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Universidad u hospital
State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology
Universidad u hospital
Sun Yat-Sen University Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology

Según 3 financiadores declarados.

Publicación

Publicado
2021-12-01 · Ophthalmology · vol. 129 · número 5 · págs. 509–519
Editorial
Elsevier BV
Citado
345 citas · más que el 100% de estudios similares · 24.7× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
32 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (revista híbrida) · CC-BY-NC-ND
Áreas de investigación
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies · Corneal surgery and disorders · Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine
Palabras clave
Medicine, Light therapy, Ophthalmology, Optometry, Internal medicine, Circadian rhythm
MeSH
humans, myopia, disease progression, refraction, ocular, phototherapy, single-blind method, eyeglasses, child

11 autores

  • Yu Jiang🇨🇳Sun Yat-sen University
  • Zhuoting Zhu🇨🇳Sun Yat-sen University
  • Xingping Tan🇨🇳Central South University; Xiangya Hospital Central South University
  • Xiangbin Kong🇨🇳Southern Medical University
  • Hui Zhong🇨🇳Shenzhen Children's Hospital
  • Jian Zhang🇨🇳Sun Yat-sen University
  • Ruilin Xiong🇨🇳Sun Yat-sen University
  • Yixiong Yuan🇨🇳Sun Yat-sen University
  • Junwen Zeng🇨🇳 · autor de correspondenciaSun Yat-sen University
  • Ian George Morgan🇦🇺Australian National University
  • Mingguang He🇨🇳🇦🇺 · autor de correspondenciaSun Yat-sen University; The University of Melbourne; Centre for Eye Research Australia

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Purpose

To assess the efficacy and safety of repeated low-level red-light (RLRL) therapy in myopia control in children.

Design

Multicenter, randomized, parallel-group, single-blind clinical trial.

Participants

Two hundred sixty-four eligible children 8 to 13 years of age with myopia of cycloplegic spherical equivalent refraction (SER) of -1.00 to -5.00 diopters (D), astigmatism of 2.50 D or less, anisometropia of 1.50 D or less, and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 0.0 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution or more were enrolled in July and August 2019. Follow-up was completed in September 2020.

Methods

Children were assigned randomly to the intervention group (RLRL treatment plus single-vision spectacle [SVS]) and the control group (SVS). The RLRL treatment was provided by a desktop light therapy device that emits red light of 650-nm wavelength at an illuminance level of approximately 1600 lux and a power of 0.29 mW for a 4-mm pupil (class I classification) and was administered at home under supervision of parents for 3 minutes per session, twice daily with a minimum interval of 4 hours, 5 days per week.

Main outcome measures

The primary outcome and a key secondary outcome were changes in axial length and SER measured at baseline and the 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up visits. Participants who had at least 1 postrandomization follow-up visit were analyzed for treatment efficacy based on a longitudinal mixed model.

Results

Among 264 randomized participants, 246 children (93.2%) were included in the analysis (117 in the RLRL group and 129 in the SVS group). Adjusted 12-month axial elongation and SER progression were 0.13 mm (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.09-0.17mm) and -0.20 D (95% CI, -0.29 to -0.11D) for RLRL treatment and 0.38 mm (95% CI, 0.34-0.42 mm) and -0.79 D (95% CI, -0.88 to -0.69 D) for SVS treatment. The differences in axial elongation and SER progression were 0.26 mm (95% CI, 0.20-0.31 mm) and -0.59D (95% CI, -0.72 to -0.46 D) between the RLRL and SVS groups. No severe adverse events (sudden vision loss ≥2 lines or scotoma), functional visual loss indicated by BCVA, or structural damage seen on OCT scans were observed.

Conclusions

Repeated low-level red-light therapy is a promising alternative treatment for myopia control in children with good user acceptability and no documented functional or structural damage.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY-NC-ND).

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.