Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Estudio2022Financiación no declaradaAcceso abierto

Creatine Supplementation for Muscle Growth: A Scoping Review of Randomized Clinical Trials from 2012 to 2021

Wu SH, Chen KL, Hsu C, Chen HC, Chen JY, Yu SY, Shiu YJ

Nutrients · 34 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Financiación no declarada

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Revisión sistemática (clasificado por nuestro filtro de IA)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación no declarada

Publicación

Publicado
2022-03-16 · Nutrients · vol. 14 · número 6 · pág. 1255
Editorial
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
Citado
54 citas · más que el 97% de estudios similares · 5.0× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
48 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (revista) · CC-BY
Áreas de investigación
Muscle metabolism and nutrition · Sports Performance and Training · Sports injuries and prevention
Palabras clave
Creatine, Medicine, Randomized controlled trial, Physical therapy, Creatine Monohydrate, MEDLINE, Internal medicine, Placebo, Alternative medicine, Pathology, Biology
MeSH
muscle, skeletal, humans, muscular diseases, creatine, dietary supplements, aged, randomized controlled trials as topic

7 autores

  • Shih-Hao Wu🇹🇼China Medical University; China Medical University Hospital; National Taiwan University of Sport
  • Kuan‐Lin Chen🇹🇼Yuan's General Hospital; National Taiwan University of Sport
  • Chin Hsu🇹🇼 · autor de correspondenciaNational Taiwan University of Sport
  • Hang-Cheng Chen🇹🇼China Medical University; China Medical University Hospital
  • Jianyu Chen🇹🇼National Taiwan University of Sport
  • Sheng-Yan Yu🇹🇼National Taiwan University of Sport
  • Yi-Jie Shiu🇹🇼National Taiwan University of Sport

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Creatine supplementation is the most popular ergonomic aid for athletes in recent years and is used for improving sport performance and muscle growth. However, creatine supplementation is not always effective in all populations. To address these discrepancies, numerous studies have examined the use of creatine supplementation for muscle growth. This scoping review aimed to investigate the effects of creatine supplementation for muscle growth in various populations, in which Arksey and O'Malley's scoping review framework is used to present the findings. For this study, we performed a systematic search of the PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases for theses and articles published between 2012 and 2021. A manual search of the reference lists of the uncovered studies was conducted and an expert panel was consulted. Two reviewers screened the articles for eligibility according to the inclusion criteria. Methodological quality was assessed using the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute's (NHLBI's) quality assessment tool. A total of 16 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were finally included. All the authors extracted key data and descriptively analyzed the data. Thematic analysis was used to categorize the results into themes. Three major themes related to muscle growth were generated: (i) subjects of creatine supplementation-muscle growth is more effective in healthy young subjects than others; (ii) training of subjects-sufficient training is important in all populations; (iii) future direction and recommendation of creatine supplementation for muscle growth-injury prevention and utilization in medical practice. Overall, creatine is an efficient form of supplementation for muscle growth in the healthy young population with adequate training in a variety of dosage strategies and athletic activities. However, more well-designed, long-term RCTs with larger sample sizes are needed in older and muscular disease-related populations to definitively determine the effects of creatine supplementation on muscle growth in these other populations.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY).

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.