Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Metaanálisis2022

Is replacing red meat with other protein sources associated with lower risks of coronary heart disease and all-cause mortality? A meta-analysis of prospective studies

Hidayat K, Chen JS, Wang HP, Wang TC, Liu YJ, Zhang XY, Rao CP, Zhang JW, Qin LQ

Nutrition reviews · 21 citas

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Metaanálisis (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte
Consumo medido con
No se indica

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente
Gobierno
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Universidad u hospital
State Key Laboratory Open Project of Radiation Medicine and Protection
Subvenciones
National Natural Science Foundation of China (82173502); National Natural Science Foundation of China (82150410453)

Según 2 financiadores declarados.

Publicación

Publicado
2022-02-13 · Nutr Rev · vol. 80 · número 9 · págs. 1959–1973
Editorial
Oxford University Press
Citado
36 citas · más que el 82% de estudios similares · 1.7× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
59 trabajos
Acceso
De pago
Áreas de investigación
Nutritional Studies and Diet · Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact · Meat and Animal Product Quality
Palabras clave
Red meat, Relative risk, Medicine, Meta-analysis, Observational study, Prospective cohort study, Lower risk, Confidence interval, Internal medicine, Pathology
MeSH
animals, humans, vegetables, coronary disease, diet, risk factors, prospective studies, observational studies as topic, red meat

9 autores

  • Khemayanto Hidayat🇨🇳 · autor de correspondenciaSoochow University
  • Jingsi Chen🇨🇳Soochow University
  • Haipeng Wang🇨🇳Soochow University; First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University
  • Tianci Wang🇨🇳Soochow University
  • Yujie Liu🇨🇳Soochow University
  • Xueying Zhang🇨🇳Suzhou Vocational Health College
  • C Hayavadana Rao🇨🇳Suzhou Vocational Health College
  • Jianwei Zhang🇨🇳Suzhou Municipal Hospital
  • Li‐Qiang Qin🇨🇳 · autor de correspondenciaSoochow University

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Context

A high amount of red meat consumption has been associated with higher risks of coronary heart disease (CHD) and all-cause mortality in a single food-exposure model. However, this model may overlook the potentially differential influence of red meat on these outcomes depending on the foods replaced by red meat.

Objective

A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis of prospective observational studies was performed to quantify the risks of CHD and all-cause mortality associated with the replacement of total, unprocessed, or processed red meat with fish/seafood, poultry, dairy, eggs, nuts, and legumes.

Data sources

The PubMed and Web of Science databases were searched to identify relevant articles published in any language from database inception to October 30, 2021.

Data extraction

The prospective observational studies were considered relevant if they reported relative risks (RRs) and 95%CIs for the associations of interest.

Data analysis

Thirteen articles were included. A random-effects model was used to estimate the summary RRs and 95%CIs for the associations of interest. Replacing total red meat with poultry (RR, 0.88, 95%CI, 0.82-0.96; I2 = 0%), dairy (RR, 0.90, 95%CI, 0.88-0.92; I2 = 0%), eggs (RR, 0.86, 95%CI, 0.79-0.94; I2 = 7.1%), nuts (RR, 0.84, 95%CI, 0.74-0.95; I2 = 66.8%), or legumes (RR, 0.84, 95%CI, 0.74-0.95; I2 = 7.3%) was associated with a lower risk of CHD, whereas substituting fish/seafood (RR, 0.91, 95%CI, 0.79-1.04; I2 = 69.5%) for total red meat was not associated with the risk of CHD. The replacement of total red meat with fish/seafood (RR, 0.92, 95%CI, 0.89-0.96; I2 = 86.9%), poultry (RR, 0.92, 95%CI, 0.90-0.95; I2 = 61.6%), eggs (RR, 0.91, 95%CI, 0.87-0.95; I2 = 33.8%), or nuts (RR, 0.92, 95%CI, 0.87-0.97; I2 = 81.9%) was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality, whereas the substitution of dairy (RR, 0.97, 95%CI, 0.93-1.01; I2 = 33.9%) or legumes (RR, 0.97, 95%CI, 0.93-1.01; I2 = 53.5%) for total red meat was not associated with the risk of all-cause mortality. Lower risks of CHD and all-cause mortality were more consistently observed for processed red meat replacements than for unprocessed red meat replacements. The results did not materially change when the analyses of total, processed, and unprocessed red meat were restricted to the studies that used a uniform substitution amount per unit of 1 serving/d.

Conclusion

Keeping red meat, particularly processed red meat, consumption to a minimum along with increasing healthier alternative protein sources to replace red meat in the diet may contribute to the prevention of CHD and premature death.

Systematic review registration

PROSPERO registration no. CRD42021259446.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.