Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Ensayo controlado aleatorizado2022

Early time-restricted eating compared with daily caloric restriction: A randomized trial in adults with obesity

Thomas EA, Zaman A, Sloggett KJ, Steinke S, Grau L, Catenacci VA, Cornier MA, Rynders CA

Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.) · 79 citas

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Ensayo controlado aleatorizado (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente
Organización sin fines de lucro
Doris Duke Charitable Foundation
Gobierno
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
Gobierno
National Center for Research Resources
Gobierno
National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Gobierno
NIDDK NIH HHS
Gobierno
NCRR NIH HHS
Gobierno
NCATS NIH HHS
Subvenciones
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30 DK048520); National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (KL2TR002534); National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R21DK117499); National Center for Research Resources (#UL1 RR025780); Doris Duke Charitable Foundation (2015212); National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (F32 DK123878); National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (K01 DK113063)

Según 7 financiadores declarados.

Publicación

Publicado
2022-04-26 · Obesity (Silver Spring) · vol. 30 · número 5 · págs. 1027–1038
Editorial
Wiley
Citado
91 citas · más que el 99% de estudios similares · 9.8× el promedio de su campo
Impacto
Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
Referencias
41 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (copia en repositorio)
Áreas de investigación
Dietary Effects on Health · Circadian rhythm and melatonin · Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
Palabras clave
Caloric theory, Medicine, Obesity, Randomized controlled trial, Caloric intake, Gerontology, Internal medicine
MeSH
humans, obesity, weight loss, lipids, caloric restriction, energy intake, adult, female, male, glycated hemoglobin

8 autores

  • Elizabeth A. Thomas🇺🇸 · autor de correspondenciaRocky Mountain MS Center; University of Colorado Anschutz
  • Adnin Zaman🇺🇸University of Colorado Anschutz
  • Kelsey J. Sloggett🇺🇸University of Colorado Anschutz
  • Sheila C. Steinke🇺🇸University of Colorado Anschutz
  • Laura Grau🇺🇸Colorado School of Public Health; University of Colorado Anschutz
  • Victoria A. Catenacci🇺🇸University of Colorado Anschutz
  • Marc‐André Cornier🇺🇸Medical University of South Carolina; Rocky Mountain MS Center; University of Colorado Anschutz
  • Corey A. Rynders🇺🇸University of Virginia; University of Colorado Anschutz

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Objective

This trial aimed to evaluate the acceptability and efficacy of early time-restricted eating plus daily caloric restriction (E-TRE+DCR) compared with DCR alone within a behavioral weight-loss intervention.

Methods

Participants (n = 81, 69 women, mean [SD] age: 38.0 [7.8] years, BMI: 34.1 [5.7] kg/m2 ) were randomized to E-TRE (10-hour eating window starting within 3 hours of waking) plus DCR or DCR alone (~35% DCR) for 39 weeks. The primary outcome was body weight (measured with digital scale) at week 12. Secondary outcomes measured at week 12 included hemoglobin A1c, lipids, energy intake (photographic food records), physical activity (accelerometry), dietary adherence (questionnaires), and body composition (dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry). Weight and body composition were also assessed at week 39.

Results

Mean [SD] weight loss was not different between groups at week 12 (E-TRE+DCR: -6.2 [4.1] kg vs. DCR: -5.1 [3.2] kg) or at week 39 (E-TRE: -4.9 [5.3] kg vs. DCR: -4.3 [5.3] kg). There were no between-group differences in changes in body composition, dietary adherence, energy intake, physical activity, hemoglobin A1c, or lipids at week 12.

Conclusions

E-TRE+DCR was found to be an acceptable dietary strategy, resulting in similar levels of adherence and weight loss compared with DCR alone.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.