Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Revisión sistemática2022Acceso abierto

Dietary Patterns during Pregnancy and Gestational Weight Gain: A Systematic Review

Ferreira LB, Lobo CV, Miranda AEDS, Carvalho BDC, Santos LCD

Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 17 citas

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Revisión sistemática (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento
Consumo medido con
No se indica

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente
Gobierno
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
Gobierno
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Gobierno
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais
Subvenciones
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (Code 001); Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (301555/2019-2); Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (406644/2016-0); Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (301555/2019-2)

Según 3 financiadores declarados y la declaración de financiación del texto completo.

Publicación

Publicado
2022-04-28 · Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet · vol. 44 · número 05 · págs. 540–547
Editorial
Thieme Medical Publishers (Germany)
Citado
25 citas · más que el 75% de estudios similares · 1.3× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
30 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (publicación gratuita) · CC-BY
Áreas de investigación
Nutritional Studies and Diet · Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet · Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
Palabras clave
Weight gain, Pregnancy, Medicine, Gestation, Obstetrics, Demography, Body weight, Internal medicine, Biology
MeSH
humans, weight gain, body mass index, diet, cohort studies, cross-sectional studies, pregnancy, female, gestational weight gain

5 autores

  • Larissa Bueno Ferreira🇧🇷 · autor de correspondenciaUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais
  • Cecília Viana Lobo🇧🇷Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
  • Aline Elizabeth da Silva Miranda🇧🇷Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
  • Brenda da Cunha Carvalho🇧🇷Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
  • Luana Caroline dos Santos🇧🇷Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

The present systematic review (PROSPERO: CRD42020148630) hypothesizes the association of excessive weight gain during pregnancy with dietary patterns composed of ultraprocessed foods. Thus, the objective was to investigate the association between dietary patterns after analysis and weight gain during pregnancy. The search for articles was performed in nine databases. Two reviewers selected the articles in the databases and extracted from them the data used in the review. Two scales were used to evaluate the quality of the selected studies: New Castle-Ottawa Quality Assessment for cohort-based studies and Appraisal tool for Cross-Sectional Studies (AXIS) for cross-sectional-based studies. In total, 11 studies were identified with sample size variation (n = 173-5,733). Women presenting more adherence to healthy and traditional patterns (fruits, vegetables, salads, nuts, and dairy) recorded less excessive gestational weight gain (GWG). Higher intake of mixed patterns and western patterns rich in ultraprocessed foods were associated with a higher prevalence of excessive GWG (24.48-55.20%). Gestational dietary patterns a posteriori-derived that have presented ultraprocessed components rich in fat and sugars presented association with high GWG; healthy and traditional dietary patterns were related to better mother-child health conditions, such as adequate GWG.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY).

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.