Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Metaanálisis2022

Can I Have My Coffee and Drink It? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis to Determine Whether Habitual Caffeine Consumption Affects the Ergogenic Effect of Caffeine

Carvalho A, Marticorena FM, Grecco BH, Barreto G, Saunders B

Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 40 citas

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Metaanálisis (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente
Gobierno
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
Gobierno
fapesp
Subvenciones
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (2019/20614-0); Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (2020/12036-3); Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (16/50438-0); Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (2020/02391-0)

Según 2 financiadores declarados.

Publicación

Publicado
2022-05-10 · Sports Med · vol. 52 · número 9 · págs. 2209–2220
Editorial
Springer Science+Business Media
Citado
49 citas · más que el 86% de estudios similares · 2.0× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
97 trabajos
Acceso
De pago
Áreas de investigación
Coffee research and impacts · Sports Performance and Training · Muscle metabolism and nutrition
Palabras clave
caffeine supplementation, habitual caffeine consumption, endurance exercise, sex differences, caffeine tolerance, caffeine dependence, caffeine withdrawal symptoms
MeSH
humans, caffeine, exercise, coffee, female, male, performance-enhancing substances

5 autores

  • Arthur Carvalho🇧🇷Universidade de São Paulo
  • Felipe Miguel Marticorena🇧🇷Universidade de São Paulo
  • Beatriz Helena Grecco🇧🇷Universidade de São Paulo
  • Gabriel Barreto🇧🇷Universidade de São Paulo
  • Bryan Saunders🇧🇷 · autor de correspondenciaUniversidade de São Paulo

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Objective

The aim was to quantify the proportion of the literature on caffeine supplementation that reports habitual caffeine consumption, and determine the influence of habitual consumption on the acute exercise response to caffeine supplementation, using a systematic review and meta-analytic approach.

Methods

Three databases were searched, and articles screened according to inclusion/exclusion criteria. Three-level meta-analyses and meta-regression models were used to investigate the influence of habitual caffeine consumption on caffeine's overall ergogenic effect and within different exercise types (endurance, power, strength), in men and women, and in trained and untrained individuals. Sub-analyses were performed according to the following: acute relative dose ( 6 mg/kg body mass [BM]); whether the acute caffeine dose provided was lower or higher than the mean daily caffeine dose; and the caffeine withdrawal period prior to the intervention ( 48 h).

Results

Sixty caffeine studies included sufficient information on habitual consumption to be included in the meta-analysis. A positive overall effect of caffeine was shown in comparison to placebo (standard mean difference [SMD] = 0.25, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.20-0.30; p 6 mg/kg BM (SMD = 0.11, 95% CI - 0.07 to 0.30; p = 0.23); when the dose was both higher (SMD = 0.26, 95% CI 0.20-0.31; p 48 h. Caffeine was effective for endurance, power, and strength exercise, with no influence (all p ≥ 0.23) of relative habitual caffeine consumption within exercise types. Habitual caffeine consumption did not modify the ergogenic effect of caffeine in male, female, trained or untrained individuals.

Conclusion

Habitual caffeine consumption does not appear to influence the acute ergogenic effect of caffeine.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.