Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Metaanálisis2023Financiación no declarada

The effectiveness of music interventions on stress response in intensive care patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Erbay Dalli Ö, Bozkurt C, Yildirim Y

Journal of clinical nursing · 10 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Financiación no declarada

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Metaanálisis (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación no declarada

Publicación

Publicado
2022-06-06 · J Clin Nurs · vol. 32 · número 11-12 · págs. 2827–2845
Editorial
Wiley
Citado
22 citas · más que el 60% de estudios similares · 0.8× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
47 trabajos
Acceso
De pago
Áreas de investigación
Music Therapy and Health · Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders · Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
Palabras clave
Meta-analysis, Anxiety, Psychological intervention, Medicine, Music therapy, Systematic review, Randomized controlled trial, Subgroup analysis, Intensive care unit, MEDLINE, Physical therapy, Stressor, Clinical psychology, Internal medicine, Psychiatry
MeSH
humans, music therapy, critical care, anxiety, anxiety disorders, music

3 autores

  • Öznur Erbay Dallı🇹🇷 · autor de correspondenciaBursa Uludağ Üni̇versi̇tesi̇
  • Canan Bozkurt🇹🇷Bandırma Onyedi Eylül University
  • Yasemin Yıldırım🇹🇷Ege University

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Aim and objective

To investigate the effectiveness of music interventions on physiological and psychological stress response in intensive care unit (ICU) patients.

Background

ICU patients are exposed to several physiological and psychological stressors during their treatments. Music interventions can be implemented to control these negative effects.

Design

Systematic review and meta-analysis conducted according to PRISMA Guidelines.

Method

Seven electronic literature databases, reference lists of similar reviews, grey literature and the Clinical Trials Registry were searched for potential studies up to 30 January 2022. Studies were expected to meet PICOS inclusion criteria. Two reviewers independently assessed the risk of bias of the included studies by using the Cochrane Collaboration tool. Overall, meta-analysis and subgroup analyses (comparator group and music session frequency) were performed using RevMan 5.4. Meta-analysis was conducted when data were available; otherwise, a narrative description was provided.

Results

Twenty-five articles were included in this meta-analysis. Across all studies, regardless of the comparator, music was found to significantly reduce anxiety scores with an SMD of 1.81 ([95% CI: -3.09,-0.53]; p = .006). Music was found to significantly reduce anxiety scores with an SMD of 1.97 (95% CI: -3.66, -0.28) compared to standard care (p = .02), but there was no significant change in anxiety scores in comparison with the noise cancellation group (p > 0.05). It was found that multiple music sessions reduced the anxiety level better than a single music session. Music had no effect the systolic/diastolic blood pressure, respiratory or heart rate level in both subgroup and general analyzes concerning the physiological stress (p > 0.05).

Conclusions

Music interventions involving multiple sessions can be used as a nursing intervention to control the anxiety levels of ICU patients.

Relevance to the clinical practice

Using music to reduce anxiety and stress levels may reduce the pharmacological need (for sedative or antipsychotic medications) and the risk of associated side effects in ICU patients.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.