Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Revisión sistemática2022Acceso abierto

The Effectiveness of Intermittent Fasting, Time Restricted Feeding, Caloric Restriction, a Ketogenic Diet and the Mediterranean Diet as Part of the Treatment Plan to Improve Health and Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: A Systematic Review

Cuevas-Cervera M, Perez-Montilla JJ, Gonzalez-Muñoz A, Garcia-Rios MC, Navarro-Ledesma S

International journal of environmental research and public health · 21 citas

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Revisión sistemática (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente

Según la declaración de financiación del texto completo.

Publicación

Publicado
2022-05-30 · Int J Environ Res Public Health · vol. 19 · número 11 · pág. 6698
Editorial
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
Citado
36 citas · más que el 82% de estudios similares · 1.5× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
69 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (revista) · CC-BY
Áreas de investigación
Dietary Effects on Health · Diet and metabolism studies · Nutritional Studies and Diet
Palabras clave
intermittent fasting, time-restricted feeding, caloric restriction, ketogenic diet, Mediterranean diet, chronic musculoskeletal pain, dietary intervention, inflammation, oxidative stress, quality of life, pain assessment
MeSH
humans, inflammation, caloric restriction, fasting, diet, mediterranean, musculoskeletal pain, chronic pain, diet, ketogenic

5 autores

  • María Cuevas-Cervera🇪🇸Universidad de Granada
  • José Javier Pérez‐Montilla🇪🇸Universidad de Granada
  • Ana Gonzalez-Muñoz
  • María del Carmen García Ríos🇪🇸Universidad de Granada
  • Santiago Navarro Ledesma🇪🇸 · autor de correspondenciaUniversidad de Granada

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Food strategies are currently used to improve inflammation and oxidative stress conditions in chronic pain which contributes to a better quality of life for patients. The main purpose of this systematic review is to analyze the effectiveness of different dietary strategies as part of the treatment plan for patients suffering from chronic pain and decreased health. PubMed, Web of Science, ProQuest, Scopus, Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Cambridge Core, and Oxford Academy databases were used to review and to appraise the literature. Randomized clinical trials (RCT), observational studies, and systematic reviews published within the last 6 years were included. The Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale, the PEDro Internal Validity (PVI), the Standard Quality Assessment Criteria for Evaluating Primary Research Papers from a variety of fields (QUALSYT), and the Quality Assessment Tool of Systematic Reviews scale were used to evaluate the risk of bias of the included studies. A total of 16 articles were included, of which 11 were RCTs and 5 were observational studies. Six of them showed an improvement in pain assessment, while two studies showed the opposite. Inflammation was shown to be decreased in four studies, while one did not show a decrease. The quality of life was shown to have improved in five studies. All of the selected studies obtained good methodological quality in their assessment scales. In the PVI, one RCT showed good internal validity, five RCTs showed moderate internal quality, while five of them were limited. Current research shows that consensus on the effects of an IF diet on pain improvement, in either the short or the long term, is lacking. A caloric restriction diet may be a good long term treatment option for people suffering from pain. Time restricted food and ketogenic diets may improve the quality of life in chronic conditions. However, more studies analyzing the effects of different nutritional strategies, not only in isolation but in combination with other therapies in the short and the long term, are needed.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY).

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.