Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Revisión sistemática2022Acceso abierto

Egg and Dietary Cholesterol Intake and Risk of All-Cause, Cardiovascular, and Cancer Mortality: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies

Darooghegi Mofrad M, Naghshi S, Lotfi K, Beyene J, Hypponen E, Pirouzi A, Sadeghi O

Frontiers in nutrition · 18 citas

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Revisión sistemática (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte
Consumo medido con
No se indica

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente

Según la declaración de financiación del texto completo.

Publicación

Publicado
2022-05-27 · Front Nutr · vol. 9 · pág. 878979
Editorial
Frontiers Media
Citado
22 citas · más que el 73% de estudios similares · 1.2× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
94 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (revista) · CC-BY
Áreas de investigación
Nutritional Studies and Diet · Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress · Phytoestrogen effects and research
Palabras clave
Medicine, Meta-analysis, Relative risk, Prospective cohort study, Cancer, Cohort study, Confidence interval, Internal medicine

7 autores

  • Manije Darooghegi Mofrad🇮🇷Tehran University of Medical Sciences
  • Sina Naghshi🇮🇷Tehran University of Medical Sciences
  • Keyhan Lotfi🇮🇷Tehran University of Medical Sciences
  • Joseph Beyene🇨🇦McMaster University Medical Centre; Impact; McMaster University
  • Elina Hyppönen🇦🇺University of South Australia; South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute
  • Aliyar Pirouzi🇮🇷 · autor de correspondenciaGerash University of Medical Sciences
  • Omid Sadeghi🇮🇷 · autor de correspondenciaIsfahan University of Medical Sciences

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Objective

This systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies examined the associations between egg and dietary cholesterol intake and the risk of mortality from all causes, including cardiovascular disease (CVD) and cancer.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Scopus, ISI Web of Knowledge, and Google Scholar until April 2021, as well as references to the relevant articles retrieved. Random-effects models were used to calculate summary relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the highest vs. lowest categories of egg and dietary cholesterol intake. Also, linear and non-linear dose-response analyses were conducted to examine the dose-response relationships.

Results

We included 55 studies, comprising data from 2,772,486 individuals with 228,425, 71,745, and 67,211 cases of all-cause, CVD, and cancer mortality, respectively. Intake of each additional egg per day was associated with a 7% higher risk of all-cause (1.07, 95% CI: 1.02-1.12, I2 = 84.8%) and a 13% higher risk of cancer mortality (1.13, 95% CI: 1.06-1.20, I2 = 54.2%), but was not associated with CVD mortality (1.00, 95% CI: 0.92-1.09, I2 = 81.5%). Non-linear analyses showed increased risks for egg consumption of more than 1.5 and 0.5 eggs/day, respectively. Each 100 mg/day increment in dietary cholesterol intake was associated with a 6% higher risk of all-cause mortality (1.06, 95% CI: 1.03-1.08, I2 = 34.5%) and a 6% higher risk of cancer mortality (1.06, 95% CI: 1.05-1.07, I2 = 0%), but was not associated with CVD mortality (1.04, 95% CI: 0.99-1.10, I2 = 85.9%). Non-linear analyses demonstrated elevated risks of CVD and cancer mortality for intakes more than 450 and 250 mg/day, respectively.

Conclusions and relevance

High-dietary intake of eggs and cholesterol was associated with all-cause and cancer mortality. Little evidence for elevated risks was seen for intakes below 0.5 egg/day or 250 mg/day of dietary cholesterol. Our findings should be considered with caution because of small risk estimates and moderate between-study heterogeneity.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=252564, PROSPERO, identifier: CRD42021252564.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY).

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.