Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Ensayo controlado aleatorizado2022Financiación no declarada

Comparative Evaluation of Ozonoid Olive Oil and Calcium Hydroxide as an Indirect Pulp Capping Agent in Primary Mandibular Second Molar: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Kalaskar RR, Badhe HK, Ninawe NS, Khade AV, Balasubramanian S, Kamki H

The journal of contemporary dental practice · 3 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Financiación no declarada

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Ensayo controlado aleatorizado (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación no declarada

Publicación

Publicado
2022-06-10 · J Contemp Dent Pract · vol. 23 · número 2 · págs. 208–214
Editorial
Jaypee Brothers
Citado
3 citas · más que el 66% de estudios similares · 0.6× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
28 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (publicación gratuita)
Áreas de investigación
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments · Medical and Biological Ozone Research · Dental materials and restorations
Palabras clave
indirect pulp capping, calcium hydroxide, antimicrobial efficacy, Streptococcus mutans, lactobacilli, bacterial reduction, pediatric dentistry
MeSH
molar, tooth, deciduous, humans, dental caries, calcium compounds, calcium hydroxide, silicates, dental pulp capping, child, child, preschool, pulp capping and pulpectomy agents, olive oil

6 autores

  • Ritesh Kalaskar🇮🇳Govt. Dental College & Hospital
  • Shruti Balasubramanian🇮🇳Govt. Dental College & Hospital
  • Henpu Kamki🇮🇳Govt. Dental College & Hospital
  • Hemraj Badhe🇮🇳Govt. Dental College & Hospital
  • Nupur Suresh Ninawe🇮🇳Govt. Dental College & Hospital
  • Anuradha Vinayak Khade🇮🇳Govt. Dental College & Hospital; Rajiv Gandhi Centre for Biotechnology

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Aim

The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical and radiographical success of ozonoid olive oil as an indirect pulp capping (IPC) agent in primary mandibular second molar when compared to calcium hydroxide and to evaluate the antimicrobial efficacy of ozonoid olive oil on Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacilli.

Materials and methods

A split-mouth randomized controlled trial was conducted on 30 primary mandibular second molars in 15 children of age 5-9 years with deep dentinal carious lesion. Teeth were randomly allocated to two groups of 15 each. After achieving local anesthesia and rubber dam isolation, an IPC procedure was performed using ozonoid olive oil in group I and calcium hydroxide in group II. Teeth were evaluated clinically and radiographically at 6 and 12 months of follow-up for success or failure of IPC. The bacterial counts of S. mutans and Lactobacilli were measured before and after application of ozonoid olive oil for 60 seconds on dentinal tissue in group I and recorded as colony-forming units per mL (CFU/mL).

Results

There were no statistically significant differences found between the materials used for IPC (p >0.05). About 93.33% and 100% clinical and radiographical success rates were seen in group I and group II, respectively. Statistically significant differences were observed for bacterial reduction after the application of ozonoid olive oil (p <0.05) for both the microorganisms.

Conclusion

The results of this study showed that the success of IPC is independent of capping material. Ozonoid olive oil, an antimicrobial agent, can also be used for IPC. The success of the IPC procedure depends on a reduction in the bacterial count and sealing of the tooth with hermetic restoration. More clinical studies with a larger sample size and longer follow-up duration are required for understanding the efficacy of this material.

Clinical significance

Ozonoid olive oil can be used as an IPC agent in primary molars and also for a bacterial reduction in dentinal caries.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.