Financiado en parte por Eli Lilly and Company, Pfizer, Sanofi, Meat and Livestock Australia, Servier, Cilag
Ultra-Processed Food Consumption and Mental Health: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies
Lane MM, Gamage E, Travica N, Dissanayaka T, Ashtree DN, Gauci S, Lotfaliany M, O'Neil A, Jacka FN, Marx W
Nutrients · 208 citas
Etiquetas de revisión
Financiado por la industriaDatos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.
Cómo se estudió
- Diseño
- Metaanálisis (indexado por PubMed)
- Estudiado en
- Personas
- Resultado principal
- Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento
- Consumo medido con
- No se indica
Quién lo pagó
- Financiación
- Financiado por la industria
- Organización sin fines de lucro
- Wilson Foundation
- Empresa
- Eli Lilly and Company
- Empresa
- Pfizer
- Empresa
- Sanofi
- Organización sin fines de lucro
- Geelong Region Medical Research Foundation
- Organización sin fines de lucro
- PA Research Foundation
- Organización sin fines de lucro
- David and Elaine Potter Foundation
- Universidad u hospital
- Bond University
- Organización sin fines de lucro
- Australian Rotary Health
- Grupo de la industria
- Meat and Livestock Australia
- Universidad u hospital
- La Trobe University
- Universidad u hospital
- Deakin University
- Empresa
- Servier
- Organización sin fines de lucro
- Fernwood Foundation
- Gobierno
- Medical Research Council
- Gobierno
- National Health and Medical Research Council
- Organización sin fines de lucro
- Cancer Council Queensland
- Universidad u hospital
- Brain and Behaviour Research Institute, University of Wollongong
- Empresa
- Cilag
- Subvenciones
- National Health and Medical Research Council (2008971)
Según 19 financiadores declarados y la declaración de financiación del texto completo.
Publicación
- Publicado
- 2022-06-21 · Nutrients · vol. 14 · número 13 · pág. 2568
- Editorial
- Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
- Citado
- 306 citas · más que el 100% de estudios similares · 14.0× el promedio de su campo
- Impacto
- Entre el 10 % más citado de su campo
- Referencias
- 91 trabajos
- Acceso
- Acceso abierto (revista) · CC-BY
- Áreas de investigación
- Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling · Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
- Palabras clave
- Odds ratio, Observational study, Medicine, Anxiety, Meta-analysis, Depression (economics), Mental health, Odds, Prospective cohort study, Hazard ratio, Psychiatry, Environmental health, Logistic regression, Confidence interval, Internal medicine
- MeSH
- humans, diet, prospective studies, cross-sectional studies, anxiety, mental health, fast foods
10 autores
- Melissa M. Lane🇦🇺 · autor de correspondenciaDeakin University
- Elizabeth Gamage🇦🇺Deakin University
- Nikolaj Travica🇦🇺Deakin University
- Thusharika Dilrukshi Dissanayaka🇦🇺Deakin University
- Deborah N Ashtree🇦🇺Deakin University
- Sarah Gauci🇦🇺Deakin University
- Mojtaba Lotfaliany🇦🇺Deakin University
- Adrienne E O'Neil🇦🇺Deakin University
- Felice Nellie Jacka🇦🇺Deakin University; Murdoch Children's Research Institute; James Cook University
- Wolfgang Marx🇦🇺Deakin University
Resumen
El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.
Since previous meta-analyses, which were limited only to depression and by a small number of studies available for inclusion at the time of publication, several additional studies have been published assessing the link between ultra-processed food consumption and depression as well as other mental disorders. We aimed to build on previously conducted reviews to synthesise and meta-analyse the contemporary evidence base and clarify the associations between the consumption of ultra-processed food and mental disorders. A total of 17 observational studies were included (n = 385,541); 15 cross-sectional and 2 prospective. Greater ultra-processed food consumption was cross-sectionally associated with increased odds of depressive and anxiety symptoms, both when these outcomes were assessed together (common mental disorder symptoms odds ratio: 1.53, 95%CI 1.43 to 1.63) as well as separately (depressive symptoms odds ratio: 1.44, 95%CI 1.14 to 1.82; and, anxiety symptoms odds ratio: 1.48, 95%CI 1.37 to 1.59). Furthermore, a meta-analysis of prospective studies demonstrated that greater ultra-processed food intake was associated with increased risk of subsequent depression (hazard ratio: 1.22, 95%CI 1.16 to 1.28). While we found evidence for associations between ultra-processed food consumption and adverse mental health, further rigorously designed prospective and experimental studies are needed to better understand causal pathways.
Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY).
Confianza de la comunidad
Cargando…
¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?
Comentarios
¿Algo está mal aquí?
Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.
Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.