Comparison of canola oil and olive oil consumption on the serum lipid profile in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Pourrajab B, Sharifi-Zahabi E, Soltani S, Shahinfar H, Shidfar F
Critical reviews in food science and nutrition · 13 citas
Etiquetas de revisión
Financiación no declaradaDatos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.
Cómo se estudió
- Diseño
- Metaanálisis (indexado por PubMed)
- Estudiado en
- Personas
- Resultado principal
- Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento
- Consumo medido con
- No se indica
Quién lo pagó
- Financiación
- Financiación no declarada
Publicación
- Publicado
- 2022-07-22 · Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr · vol. 63 · número 33 · págs. 12270–12284
- Editorial
- Taylor & Francis
- Citado
- 15 citas · más que el 37% de estudios similares · 0.5× el promedio de su campo
- Referencias
- 59 trabajos
- Acceso
- De pago
- Áreas de investigación
- Edible Oils Quality and Analysis · Coconut Research and Applications · Fatty Acid Research and Health
- Palabras clave
- Canola, Meta-analysis, Olive oil, Randomized controlled trial, Medicine, Confidence interval, Blood lipids, Triglyceride, Vegetable oil, Internal medicine, Lipid profile, Food science, Animal science, Chemistry, Cholesterol, Biology
- MeSH
- lipids, triglycerides, plant oils, cholesterol, ldl, cholesterol, hdl, randomized controlled trials as topic, olive oil, rapeseed oil
5 autores
- Behnaz Pourrajab🇮🇷Iran University of Medical Sciences
- Elham Sharifi‐Zahabi🇮🇷Iran University of Medical Sciences
- Sepideh Soltani🇮🇷Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences and Health Services
- Hossein Shahinfar🇮🇷Iran University of Medical Sciences
- Farzad Shidfar🇮🇷 · autor de correspondenciaIran University of Medical Sciences
Resumen
El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.
Background and aims
Several randomized clinical trials have investigated the effects of canola oil (CO) compared to olive oil (OO) on the serum lipid profiles in adults. However, the results of these studies are inconsistent. Thus, this study aimed to assess the comparison of CO and OO consumption on the serum lipid components in adults.
Methods and results
The following online databases were searched until February 4th, 2022: PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Clarivate Analytics Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Google Scholar. The effect sizes were stated as the weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). A total of 13 eligible trials were included in this meta-analysis. The results showed that the CO consumption, significantly reduced serum LDL-c (WMD: -6.13 mg/dl, 95%CI: -9.79, -2.46, p = 0.001), TC (WMD: -8.92 mg/dl, 95% CI: -13.52, -4.33, P < 0.001) and LDL-c/HDL-c ratio (WMD: -0.30; 95% CI, -0.53, -0.06, p = 0.01) levels compared to OO. There were no significant changes in the other components of the blood lipids.
Conclusion
The results of this review suggest that CO consumptionhas beneficial effects on LDL-c, TC, and LDL-c/HDL-c ratio compared to OO. Therefore, its replacement with OO can have cardioprotective impacts.
Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.
Confianza de la comunidad
Cargando…
¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?
Comentarios
¿Algo está mal aquí?
Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.
Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.