Eggs Consumption in Relation to Lower Risk of Cognitive Impairment in Elderly: Findings from a 6-Year Cohort Study
Li FD, Tong ZD, Chang Y, Li KF, Gu X, Zhang T, Lin JF
The journal of nutrition, health & aging · 10 citas
Etiquetas de revisión
Cuestionario de frecuencia de consumoSin ajuste declarado por estilo de vidaDatos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.
Cómo se estudió
- Diseño
- Estudio de cohortes (indexado por PubMed)
- Estudiado en
- Personas
- Resultado principal
- Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento
- Consumo medido con
- Cuestionario de frecuencia de consumo
Quién lo pagó
- Financiación
- Financiación independiente
Según la declaración de financiación del texto completo.
Publicación
- Publicado
- 2022-06-05 · J Nutr Health Aging · vol. 26 · número 8 · págs. 771–777
- Editorial
- Springer Science+Business Media
- Citado
- 15 citas · más que el 88% de estudios similares · 2.3× el promedio de su campo
- Referencias
- 30 trabajos
- Acceso
- Acceso abierto (revista híbrida) · CC-BY-NC-ND
- Áreas de investigación
- Nutritional Studies and Diet · Nutrition and Health in Aging · Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Palabras clave
- Confounding, Medicine, Cohort, Cohort study, Demography, Cognition, Prospective cohort study, Relative risk, Lower risk, Cognitive impairment, Effects of sleep deprivation on cognitive performance, Gerontology, Confidence interval, Internal medicine, Psychiatry
- MeSH
- humans, risk factors, cohort studies, prospective studies, feeding behavior, aged, china, cognitive dysfunction
7 autores
- Fudong Li🇨🇳Zhejiang Center for Disease Control and Prevention
- Z.D. Tong
- Yu‐Ling Chang🇨🇳Taizhou Municipal Hospital
- Kaicheng Li
- Xiaolan Gu🇨🇳Zhejiang Center for Disease Control and Prevention
- T. Zhang🇨🇳Zhejiang Center for Disease Control and Prevention
- Junfen Lin🇨🇳 · autor de correspondenciaZhejiang Center for Disease Control and Prevention
Resumen
El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.
Objectives
To evaluate the longitudinal association of eggs consumption with cognitive function in Chinese elderly.
Design
Prospective cohort study.
Participants
9028 participants aged ≥60 years from Zhejiang Ageing and Health Cohort Study without cognitive impairment at baseline survey.
Measurements
Cognitive function was assessed through the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) at baseline and three waves of follow-up (2015, 2016, and 2019-2020). Data on eggs consumption was collected in the diet habits section within the questionnaire at baseline. Log-binomial regression models with the Generalized Estimating Equations, controlled for an extensive range of potential confounders, were used to evaluate the association and estimate relative risks (RRs).
Results
After 6 years of follow-up, 3266 (36.18%) participants were indicated as cognitive impairment by MMSE at least once. Compared with non-consumers or less-than-weekly consumers, participants consuming 0.1-2.9 eggs/week and 3.0-5.9 eggs/week had 18% (RR=0.82, 95%CI 0.76-0.89) and 9% (RR=0.91, 95%CI 0.84-0.99) lower risks of cognitive impairment respectively, whereas no association was found in those consuming ≥6.0 eggs/week (P=0.32). Moreover, infrequent lower-quantity consumption (1-2 days/week and 0.1-1.9 eggs/day), infrequent higher-quantity consumption (1-2 days/week and ≥2.0 eggs/day), and frequent lower-quantity consumption (≥3 days/week and 0.1-1.9 eggs/day) were associated with better cognitive performance, whereas null association was found among frequent higher-quantity consumers (≥3 days/week and ≥2.0 eggs/day). The sensitivity analyses yielded consistent results to the main analysis.
Conclusion
Limited eggs consumption is prospectively related to a lower risk of cognitive impairment in Chinese elderly.
Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY-NC-ND).
Confianza de la comunidad
Cargando…
¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?
Comentarios
¿Algo está mal aquí?
Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.
Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.