Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Metaanálisis2022Financiación no declarada

Efficacy of low-level laser therapy on pain, disability, pressure pain threshold, and range of motion in patients with myofascial neck pain syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Tehrani MR, Nazary-Moghadam S, Zeinalzadeh A, Moradi A, Mehrad-Majd H, Sahebalam M

Lasers in medical science · 20 citas

Etiquetas de revisión

Financiación no declarada

Datos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Metaanálisis (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación no declarada

Publicación

Publicado
2022-08-13 · Lasers Med Sci · vol. 37 · número 9 · págs. 3333–3341
Editorial
Springer Science+Business Media
Citado
31 citas · más que el 59% de estudios similares · 0.6× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
42 trabajos
Acceso
De pago
Áreas de investigación
Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment · Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine · Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Palabras clave
low-level laser therapy, neck pain, pain intensity, pressure pain threshold, range of motion, disability, laser treatment efficacy
MeSH
humans, fibromyalgia, myofascial pain syndromes, neck pain, range of motion, articular, pain threshold, randomized controlled trials as topic, low-level light therapy

6 autores

  • Mohammad Reza Hossein Tehrani🇮🇷Mashhad University of Medical Sciences; Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
  • Salman Nazary‐Moghadam🇮🇷 · autor de correspondenciaMashhad University of Medical Sciences
  • Afsaneh Zeinalzadeh🇮🇷Mashhad University of Medical Sciences
  • Ali Moradi🇮🇷Mashhad University of Medical Sciences; Ghaem Hospital
  • Hassan Mehrad‐Majd🇮🇷Mashhad University of Medical Sciences
  • Mohamad Sahebalam🇮🇷Iran University of Medical Sciences; Mashhad University of Medical Sciences

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) is one of recent modalities for treatment of myofascial neck pain (MNP). Several RCTs have been conducted on its effectiveness. The aim of this comprehensive meta-analysis was to evaluate the effectiveness of LLLT on MNP. Electronic databases were searched for identifying eligible studies comparing the effectiveness of LLLT using any wavelength with placebo or active control in myofascial neck pain up to June 2022. Data related to pain intensity, pain pressure threshold (PPT), range of motion (ROM), and disability was analyzed as a pooled estimate of mean difference or standard mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using random/fixed-effect model. Funnel plot and Egger's linear regression test were also conducted to examine the risk of publication bias. A total of 13 randomized controlled trials were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The data assessing laser effectiveness on different outcomes of 556 patients were considered for meta-analysis. Pooled results revealed that LLLT was significantly effective in pain reduction (MD = - 1.29, 95% CI = - 2.36; - 0.23, P < 0.001). Also, secondary outcomes including PPT (SMD of 2.63, 95% CI = 0.96; 4.30, P < 0.01) and right bending ROM (SMD of 3.44, 95% CI = 0.64; 6.24, P < 0.01) were improved, while disability (MD of - 7.83, 95% CI = - 17.1; 0.08, P = 1.34) did not improve significantly after LLLT. Our meta-data revealed that LLLT may reduce myofascial neck pain and its related outcomes. LLLT is suggested to be used by clinicians along with other therapies such as manual and exercise therapy.

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.