Associations of red and processed meat intake with screen-detected colorectal lesions
Kværner AS, Birkeland E, Vinberg E, Hoff G, Hjartåker A, Rounge TB, Berstad P
The British journal of nutrition · 4 citas
Etiquetas de revisión
Cuestionario de frecuencia de consumoSin ajuste declarado por estilo de vidaDatos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.
Cómo se estudió
- Diseño
- Estudio transversal (clasificado por nuestro filtro de IA)
- Estudiado en
- Personas
- Resultado principal
- Eventos clínicos como enfermedad o muerte
- Consumo medido con
- Cuestionario de frecuencia de consumo
Quién lo pagó
- Financiación
- Financiación independiente
- Organización sin fines de lucro
- Kreftforeningen
- Gobierno
- Norges Forskningsråd
Según 2 financiadores declarados y la declaración de financiación del texto completo.
Publicación
- Publicado
- 2022-09-07 · Br J Nutr · vol. 129 · número 12 · págs. 2122–2132
- Editorial
- Cambridge University Press
- Citado
- 8 citas · más que el 69% de estudios similares · 0.7× el promedio de su campo
- Referencias
- 57 trabajos
- Acceso
- Acceso abierto (revista híbrida) · CC-BY
- Áreas de investigación
- Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection · Nutritional Studies and Diet
- Palabras clave
- Red meat, Medicine, Colonoscopy, White meat, Colorectal cancer, Internal medicine, Gastroenterology, Food science, Pathology, Cancer, Biology
- MeSH
- humans, colorectal neoplasms, colonoscopy, occult blood, diet, meat, meat products, aged, middle aged, norway, female, male, early detection of cancer, red meat
7 autores
- Ane Sørlie Kværner🇳🇴 · autor de correspondenciaCancer Registry of Norway
- Einar Elvbakken Birkeland🇳🇴University of Oslo; Cancer Registry of Norway
- Elina Vinberg🇳🇴Cancer Registry of Norway
- Geir S. Hoff🇳🇴Telemark Hospital; Cancer Registry of Norway
- Anette Hjartåker🇳🇴University of Oslo
- Trine B. Rounge🇳🇴University of Oslo; Cancer Registry of Norway
- Paula Berstad🇳🇴 · autor de correspondenciaCancer Registry of Norway
Resumen
El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.
Limited data exist regarding the role of meat consumption in early-stage colorectal carcinogenesis. We examined associations of red and processed meat intake with screen-detected colorectal lesions in immunochemical fecal occult blood test (FIT)-positive participants, enrolled in the Norwegian CRCbiome study during 2017-2021, aged 55-77 years. Absolute and energy-adjusted intakes of red and processed meat (combined and individually) were assessed using a validated, semi-quantitative FFQ. Associations between meat intake and screen-detected colorectal lesions were examined using multinomial logistic regression analyses with adjustment for key covariates. Of 1162 participants, 319 presented with advanced colorectal lesions at colonoscopy. High v. low energy-adjusted intakes of red and processed meat combined, as well as red meat alone, were borderline to significantly positively associated with advanced colorectal lesions (OR of 1·24 (95 % CI 0·98, 1·57) and 1·34 (95 % CI 1·07, 1·69), respectively). A significant dose-response relationship was also observed for absolute intake levels (OR of 1·32 (95 % CI 1·09, 1·60) per 100 g/d increase in red and processed meat). For processed meat, no association was observed between energy-adjusted intakes and advanced colorectal lesions. A significant positive association was, however, observed for participants with absolute intake levels ≥ 100 v. < 50 g/d (OR of 1·19 (95 % CI 1·09, 1·31)). In summary, high intakes of red and processed meat were associated with presence of advanced colorectal lesions at colonoscopy in FIT-positive participants. The study demonstrates a potential role of dietary data to improve the performance of FIT-based screening.
Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY).
Confianza de la comunidad
Cargando…
¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?
Comentarios
¿Algo está mal aquí?
Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.
Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.