Lanzamiento Enero 2027

Revisión sistemática2022Acceso abierto

Correlations between smartphone addiction and alexithymia, attachment style, and subjective well-being: A meta-analysis

Ding Y, Huang H, Zhang Y, Peng Q, Yu J, Lu G, Wu H, Chen C

Frontiers in psychology · 23 citas

Cómo se estudió

Diseño
Revisión sistemática (indexado por PubMed)
Estudiado en
Personas
Resultado principal
Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento

Quién lo pagó

Financiación
Financiación independiente
Universidad u hospital
Henan University
Universidad u hospital
Division of Graduate Education
Subvenciones
Henan University (2018JC38); Henan University (SYL19060141); Henan University (YJS2021AL074)

Según 2 financiadores declarados y la declaración de financiación del texto completo.

Publicación

Publicado
2022-09-02 · Front Psychol · vol. 13 · pág. 971735
Editorial
Frontiers Media
Citado
50 citas · más que el 86% de estudios similares · 2.0× el promedio de su campo
Referencias
113 trabajos
Acceso
Acceso abierto (revista) · CC-BY
Áreas de investigación
Impact of Technology on Adolescents · Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments · Workaholism, burnout, and well-being
Palabras clave
smartphone addiction, alexithymia, attachment styles, attachment anxiety, attachment avoidance, subjective well-being, life satisfaction, positive emotions, negative emotions, age moderation

8 autores

  • Yueming Ding🇨🇳Henan University
  • Haitao Huang🇨🇳Henan University
  • Yiming Zhang🇨🇳Henan University
  • Qianwen Peng🇨🇳Henan University
  • Jingfen Yu🇨🇳Henan University
  • Guangli Lu🇨🇳Henan University
  • Huifang Wu🇨🇳 · autor de correspondenciaHenan University
  • Chaoran Chen🇨🇳 · autor de correspondenciaHenan University

Resumen

El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.

Background

Smartphone addiction (SA) has become a social problem that affects peoples' quality of life and is frequently reported to be correlated with alexithymia, avoidant or anxious attachment styles, and subjective well-being. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between SA and alexithymia, attachment style, and subjective well-being.

Methods

A meta-analysis was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The following electronic databases were searched: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, PsycINFO, PsycArticles, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), WANFANG DATA, and Chongqing VIP Information Co., Ltd. (VIP). Stata 16.0 was used to analyze the overall effect and test the moderating effect.

Results

One hundred and ten studies were included, involving a total of 96,680 participants. SA had a significantly high positive correlation with alexithymia (r = 0.40), attachment anxiety (r = 0.37), and negative emotions (r = 0.31), and a low positive correlation with attachment avoidance (r = 0.17). In addition, there was a high negative correlation between SA and subjective well-being (r = -0.33) and a low negative correlation between SA, life satisfaction (r = -0.17), and positive emotions (r = -0.18). A moderation analysis revealed that age significantly moderated the relationship between SA and positive emotions. The tools for measuring SA significantly moderated the relationship between SA, alexithymia, attachment anxiety, and subjective well-being. Meanwhile, subjective well-being measurement tools significantly moderated the relationships between SA, subjective well-being, and negative emotions.

Conclusion

SA was closely related to alexithymia, attachment style, and subjective well-being. In the future, longitudinal research can be conducted to better investigate the dynamic changes in the relationship between them.

Systematic review registration

[www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/], identifier [CRD42022334798].

Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial (CC BY).

Confianza de la comunidad

Cargando…

¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?

0 · nada10 · totalmente

Comentarios

¿Algo está mal aquí?

Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.

Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.