Effects of Cold-Water Immersion Compared with Other Recovery Modalities on Athletic Performance Following Acute Strenuous Exercise in Physically Active Participants: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression
Moore E, Fuller JT, Bellenger CR, Saunders S, Halson SL, Broatch JR, Buckley JD
Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 39 citas
Etiquetas de revisión
Financiación no declaradaDatos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.
Cómo se estudió
- Diseño
- Metaanálisis (indexado por PubMed)
- Estudiado en
- Personas
- Resultado principal
- Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento
Quién lo pagó
- Financiación
- Financiación no declarada
Publicación
- Publicado
- 2022-12-17 · Sports Med · vol. 53 · número 3 · págs. 687–705
- Editorial
- Springer Science+Business Media
- Citado
- 51 citas · más que el 89% de estudios similares · 2.2× el promedio de su campo
- Referencias
- 75 trabajos
- Acceso
- De pago
- Áreas de investigación
- Exercise and Physiological Responses · Thermoregulation and physiological responses · Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
- Palabras clave
- Sports medicine, Meta-analysis, Meta-regression, Physical therapy, Medicine, Modalities, Physical medicine and rehabilitation, Immersion (mathematics), Exercise physiology, Hydrotherapy, Internal medicine, Alternative medicine
- MeSH
- humans, water, creatine kinase, immersion, athletic performance, cold temperature, myalgia
7 autores
- Emma Moore🇦🇺 · autor de correspondenciaUniversity of South Australia
- JOEL THOMAS FULLER🇦🇺Macquarie University
- Clint Ronald Bellenger🇦🇺University of South Australia
- Siena Saunders🇦🇺University of South Australia
- Shona Leigh Halson
- James R. Broatch🇦🇺Victoria University
- Jonathan David Buckley🇦🇺University of South Australia
Resumen
El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.
Background
Studies investigating the effects of common recovery modalities following acute strenuous exercise have reported mixed results.
Objectives
This systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression compared the effects of cold-water immersion (CWI) against other common recovery modalities on recovery of athletic performance, perceptual outcomes, and creatine kinase (CK) following acute strenuous exercise in physically active populations.
Study design
Systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression.
Methods
The MEDLINE, SPORTDiscus, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, EmCare, and Embase databases were searched up until September 2022. Studies were included if they were peer reviewed, published in English, included participants who were involved in sport or deemed physically active, compared CWI with other recovery modalities following an acute bout of strenuous exercise, and included measures of performance, perceptual measures of recovery, or CK.
Results
Twenty-eight studies were meta-analysed. CWI was superior to other recovery methods for recovering from muscle soreness, and similar to other methods for recovery of muscular power and flexibility. CWI was more effective than active recovery, contrast water therapy and warm-water immersion for most recovery outcomes. Air cryotherapy was significantly more effective than CWI for the promotion of recovery of muscular strength and the immediate recovery of muscular power (1-h post-exercise). Meta-regression revealed that water temperature and exposure duration were rarely exposure moderators.
Conclusion
CWI is effective for promoting recovery from acute strenuous exercise in physically active populations compared with other common recovery methods.
Protocol registration
Open Science Framework: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/NGP7C.
Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.
Confianza de la comunidad
Cargando…
¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?
Comentarios
¿Algo está mal aquí?
Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.
Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.