Ultra-processed food intake and risk of depression: a systematic review
Tian YR, Deng CY, Xie HC, Long QJ, Yao Y, Deng Y, Zhao H, Li Y, Liu H, Xiao L
Nutricion hospitalaria · 13 citas
Etiquetas de revisión
Financiación no declaradaDatos neutrales que nuestra revisión registró sobre cómo se hizo este estudio. Describen el método, nunca si nos gusta el resultado.
Cómo se estudió
- Diseño
- Revisión sistemática (indexado por PubMed)
- Estudiado en
- Personas
- Resultado principal
- Marcadores de salud y funcionamiento
- Consumo medido con
- No se indica
Quién lo pagó
- Financiación
- Financiación no declarada
Publicación
- Publicado
- 2022-01-01 · Nutr Hosp · vol. 40 · número 1 · págs. 160–176
- Editorial
- Arán Ediciones
- Citado
- 11 citas · más que el 52% de estudios similares · 0.5× el promedio de su campo
- Referencias
- 0 trabajos
- Acceso
- Acceso abierto (revista) · CC-BY-NC-SA
- Áreas de investigación
- Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling · Nutritional Studies and Diet · Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
- Palabras clave
- ultra-processed foods, depression, depressive symptoms, dietary intake, food processing, diet and mental health
- MeSH
- humans, cohort studies, cross-sectional studies, depression, bias, food, processed
10 autores
- Hui Liu🇨🇳Jiulongpo Center for Disease Control and Prevention; Lanzhou University
- Ying-Rui Tian🇨🇳Jiulongpo Center for Disease Control and Prevention
- Chunyan Deng🇨🇳Jiulongpo Center for Disease Control and Prevention
- He-Chuan Xie🇨🇳Jiulongpo Center for Disease Control and Prevention
- Qian-Jing Long🇨🇳Jiulongpo Center for Disease Control and Prevention
- Yuan Yao🇨🇳Jiulongpo Center for Disease Control and Prevention
- Deng Yan🇨🇳Lanzhou University
- Hao Zhao🇨🇳Lanzhou University
- Yong Li🇨🇳Lanzhou University
- Lun Xiao🇨🇳Jiulongpo Center for Disease Control and Prevention
Resumen
El texto original del estudio, en el idioma en que se publicó.
Introduction
Objective: to conduct a systematic review of the observational studies analyzing the association between ultra-processed food (UPF) intake and the risk of depression. Design: the search adhered to the guidelines of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA); a search for observational studies published until June 2020 was performed in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases, followed by additional manual searches. Eight reviewers, working independently in teams of two, screened studies for eligibility, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. We resolved disagreements through discussion or, if necessary, through adjudication by a third (LH). And the study assessed cross-sectional studies using the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) methodological checklist and cohort and case-control studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for quality. We used a tabular format to summarize the articles. Results: twenty-eight studies evaluating UPF intake and risk of depression were finally selected, 21 of which had a cross-sectional design, 6 studies had a cohort design, and 1 had a case-control design. Of these, 4 cohort studies and 17 cross-sectional studies found that consumption of UPF were positively associated with depression or depressive symptoms. Conclusions: our review demonstrated that most studies included in the systematic review showed that UPF consumption is associated with the risk of depression. Future studies should consider the use of validated food intake assessments and standardized depression assessment methods to promote comparability between studies.
Resumen vía Europe PMC. Los derechos de autor siguen siendo de los autores o la editorial.
Confianza de la comunidad
Cargando…
¿Cuánto confías en los hallazgos de este estudio?
Comentarios
¿Algo está mal aquí?
Señala este estudio si su información, etiquetas o financiación parecen incorrectas. Un editor revisa cada señalamiento.
Información educativa sobre investigación publicada. No es consejo médico ni una recomendación para empezar o dejar nada.